People should be forbidden to have tax money taken out of their paychecks

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

mrSHEiK124

Lifer
Mar 6, 2004
11,488
2
0
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: TheNinja
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: jpeyton
You guys elected him, now deal with the deficit spending.

Actually, it's more like deficit gorging.

What the hell are you talking about? Taxes have been around since we were under British rule, which is one of the reasons we threw a little tea party.
Remember the whole "Taxation without Representation" thing?

Check out his sig...it's pretty obvious he's one of those people who will probably try to blame the Civil War on Bush among other things.

Oh. Of course. Bush is the reason I pay taxes.
How silly of me to overlook that. :disgust:

Truth be told, I dont mind having my tax money go to war. I DONT like it going to social programs that support giving handouts instead of handups, or aid that goes to hostile foreign countries such as Palestine and aid to African countries.

But the point isnt where or where not tax money should be spent, but rather that people should care a bit more about taxes. And one way to get people to wake up to taxes and thus how the money is spent is by removing pay as you go.

Flame elsewhere bitch, both the Palestinian people and African people in the poorer regions of Africa are in a gigantic humanitarian crisis ATM and it'd be stupid to just sit by and watch tons of people die. If you don't like it, go whine to your representative or senator.
 

Specop 007

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
9,454
0
0
Originally posted by: BD2003
Real convenient for you to say. As long as you capitalize it, it become truth. It may be an equal tax, but its not fair, or just.

We have tax brackets for a reason. Rich people can and should be rich, but there needs to be a limit to this, or else it is greed, greed that spirals wildly out of control. The richest of people make money not on what they do, but on compound interest from the money they or their parents have saved. With your *fair* tax, none of that would be taxed. It grows to ridiculous amounts, and the cycle just continues. More money goes to the people who have money.

Those that don't have the money, those that have to live check to check, will be adversely affected. Rather than paying a lower amount of tax because they're barely scraping by, will get hit on the head with a disproportionate burden. They're paying the same percentage, but they need that money far far more than the wealthy who complains that he only gained 1 million instead of 1.5 million in the stock market last year. Boo hoo....he's not starving, and because his money is making his money, essentially his earnings are coming from those working blokes who are now paying more and earning less while he works less and earns more.

Sure, you could argue that anyone could invest, which is true - but the flat tax raises the barrier of entry even further.

The rich are the largest contributors, ignoring corporate tax. Yet they still remain rich. You don't hear a lot of stories nowadays how the wealthier are getting less wealthy...quite the opposite. Flat tax = less tax from rich, so to make up the shortfall, it comes from the poor.

Might as well forget about charitable deductions, educational or child credits. Just what we need, a nation of even poorer people, less charity, less education, and less children (that last one is arguable).

What a fantastic idea. I wonder why we haven't implemented it yet.

We havent implemented it yet because poor people dont want to be treated fairly, they want special treatment.
Would it be fair if we just gave everyone a college degree? You reward ones hard work, not ones ability to leech. You reward ones drive for success, not their drive to do notrhing.
Your system, the current system, does a wonderful job of enabling people to continue doing nothing. It empowers the poor to remain poor.

Few people will admit it, but the fact is social systems are the biggest sham ever pulled on poor people.
 

Specop 007

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
9,454
0
0
Originally posted by: mrSHEiK124
Flame elsewhere bitch, both the Palestinian people and African people in the poorer regions of Africa are in a gigantic humanitarian crisis ATM and it'd be stupid to just sit by and watch tons of people die. If you don't like it, go whine to your representative or senator.

Is that my fault? Why must I pay for every poor downtrodden Joe in the entire world. Not my problem.
And since we're getting off topic, why the hell do I want to give money to my enemies? Maybe, just MAYBE, some of these people would be a bit nicer if they realized how much we give them. Lets cut all our aid to say Palestine and see if maybe they dont stop to think for a minute that maybe blowing up the hand that feeds them aint such a hot idea.
 

Extelleron

Diamond Member
Dec 26, 2005
3,127
0
71
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Extelleron
I'm too young to pay taxes other than sales tax (buying online FTW) but in all honesty my parents have no idea how much they pay for taxes. It's truly a wonder to me why people don't pay more attention to where a large percentage of their money is going.

you're supposed to remit taxes from online purchases back to your state. all you're doing is breaking the law.

You don't pay taxes on any online goods unless the person you're buying from is in your own state..........
 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Originally posted by: Extelleron
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Extelleron
I'm too young to pay taxes other than sales tax (buying online FTW) but in all honesty my parents have no idea how much they pay for taxes. It's truly a wonder to me why people don't pay more attention to where a large percentage of their money is going.

you're supposed to remit taxes from online purchases back to your state. all you're doing is breaking the law.

You don't pay taxes on any online goods unless the person you're buying from is in your own state..........

Upfront, no.

In most states, there is what's called a Use Tax. You must pay to your state the difference between the tax you were charged and what you would've been in the state that the product is going to be "used" the most.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
0
Originally posted by: Specop 007
I think the American public has become insensitive to taxes. Come tax time you hear about how people are looking forward to their return. They forget that throughout the year they've been paying taxes steadily. Its a shame when people look forward to tax time.
I think it should be forbidden to have taxes taken out as you go through the year. You should recieve all your earnings, then at the end of the year file your taxes.

If people started to have to write a check for 3, 4, 5 thousand or more dollars every April 15th they may pay a bit more attention to taxes and where the money was going. As it stands now taxes are considered a niusance, the deficit "just a number".

No more pay as you go with taxes I say.

just put down 60 for a number of dependencies and you're set
 

BD2003

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
16,815
1
81
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: BD2003
Real convenient for you to say. As long as you capitalize it, it become truth. It may be an equal tax, but its not fair, or just.

We have tax brackets for a reason. Rich people can and should be rich, but there needs to be a limit to this, or else it is greed, greed that spirals wildly out of control. The richest of people make money not on what they do, but on compound interest from the money they or their parents have saved. With your *fair* tax, none of that would be taxed. It grows to ridiculous amounts, and the cycle just continues. More money goes to the people who have money.

Those that don't have the money, those that have to live check to check, will be adversely affected. Rather than paying a lower amount of tax because they're barely scraping by, will get hit on the head with a disproportionate burden. They're paying the same percentage, but they need that money far far more than the wealthy who complains that he only gained 1 million instead of 1.5 million in the stock market last year. Boo hoo....he's not starving, and because his money is making his money, essentially his earnings are coming from those working blokes who are now paying more and earning less while he works less and earns more.

Sure, you could argue that anyone could invest, which is true - but the flat tax raises the barrier of entry even further.

The rich are the largest contributors, ignoring corporate tax. Yet they still remain rich. You don't hear a lot of stories nowadays how the wealthier are getting less wealthy...quite the opposite. Flat tax = less tax from rich, so to make up the shortfall, it comes from the poor.

Might as well forget about charitable deductions, educational or child credits. Just what we need, a nation of even poorer people, less charity, less education, and less children (that last one is arguable).

What a fantastic idea. I wonder why we haven't implemented it yet.

We havent implemented it yet because poor people dont want to be treated fairly, they want special treatment.
Would it be fair if we just gave everyone a college degree? You reward ones hard work, not ones ability to leech. You reward ones drive for success, not their drive to do notrhing.
Your system, the current system, does a wonderful job of enabling people to continue doing nothing. It empowers the poor to remain poor.

Few people will admit it, but the fact is social systems are the biggest sham ever pulled on poor people.

The problem is you are measuring success by achievement, and ignoring opportunity.

The rich want special treatment just as much as the poor. As badly as the welfare mom wants to get that free check every month, the trust fund kid wants to keep every cent. Both want to justify earning what they have.

The welfare mom says I'm starving, I need food, are you going to let me and my kids go homeless and die in the street? She's right, and we as a civilized nation shouldnt let that happen. But give that helping hand, and she'll come to expect it, and feels she deserves it. It only ends up compounding the problem.

The trust fund kid believes that it's his birthright. His parents rightfully earned the money, so she should have it. And he's right. They most likely legally earned it, and why shouldnt he be able to keep ALL of it? But that money just makes more money, and it only concentrates the wealth in the hands of the few, which is something as a nation that we aren't really cool with.

In other words, dont think you deserve what you haven't earned. The wealthy peoples investment in our stock market etc, is an important part of our economy, and should and is rewarded. But there is a point where both the poor and the rich expect too much, for too little work.

The poor get a lot of help in this country, but it isnt a nanny state. If you've lived in or near a poor neighborhood, you'd know that regardless of the help they get, they lead sh*tty lives...theyre not dancing in the street from free money. No one chooses to be in that situation. They are there because they dont know any better, or don't have the opportunity to learn or do any better because theyre struggling to survive. The fantasy you are having about the poor people who live off the free handout and love every minute of not having to work is absurd, applicable to surely only a small minority.

The rich get taxed more heavily than the middle and lower classes, but at the end of the day, theyre still rich. They're rich because they are at the top of the pyramid, the pyramid which cannot exist without the middle and lower classes below them. So should they get taxed more, because they are rich essentially only with the help of everyone else? Hell yes.

Right now, the system is still functioning to maintain that balance, but it is tipping in the direction of polarization, which I personally think is a bad thing. I don't claim to have the answer to poverty...our current system isnt really it, but yours DEFINITELY isnt it.
 

Extelleron

Diamond Member
Dec 26, 2005
3,127
0
71
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: Extelleron
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Extelleron
I'm too young to pay taxes other than sales tax (buying online FTW) but in all honesty my parents have no idea how much they pay for taxes. It's truly a wonder to me why people don't pay more attention to where a large percentage of their money is going.

you're supposed to remit taxes from online purchases back to your state. all you're doing is breaking the law.

You don't pay taxes on any online goods unless the person you're buying from is in your own state..........

Upfront, no.

In most states, there is what's called a Use Tax. You must pay to your state the difference between the tax you were charged and what you would've been in the state that the product is going to be "used" the most.

Can't say I've ever heard of that before. And how exactly would you do that anyway? Write the state a check and sent it their way? ;)


 

foghorn67

Lifer
Jan 3, 2006
11,883
63
91
Flat Tax. That was a lot of written rubbish. Flat Tax would work, people much smarter then us have crunched numbers on it.
Poor people will have much more incentive. Mid-Income salary raises will actually mean something.
 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Originally posted by: Extelleron
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: Extelleron
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Extelleron
I'm too young to pay taxes other than sales tax (buying online FTW) but in all honesty my parents have no idea how much they pay for taxes. It's truly a wonder to me why people don't pay more attention to where a large percentage of their money is going.

you're supposed to remit taxes from online purchases back to your state. all you're doing is breaking the law.

You don't pay taxes on any online goods unless the person you're buying from is in your own state..........

Upfront, no.

In most states, there is what's called a Use Tax. You must pay to your state the difference between the tax you were charged and what you would've been in the state that the product is going to be "used" the most.

Can't say I've ever heard of that before. And how exactly would you do that anyway? Write the state a check and sent it their way? ;)

For you:
http://www.revenue.state.pa.us/revenue/cwp/view.asp?a=11&q=48828

http://www.revenue.state.pa.us/revenue/...#search=%22pennsylvania%20use%20tax%22

It's OK to be ignorant on a subject. We all are when it comes to certain things. Now you've got the information to do something about it.
 

erub

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2000
5,481
0
0
I put down 11 withholdings because I only work 3 months out of the year at my relatively high paying internship, which would put me into a pretty high tax bracket if I worked year round..I put down 2 for my job as a TA (much lower salary)

I've heard that you can't get penalized for underpayment as long as you pay in more taxes than you paid last year..is this true? I think I actually guessed about right though including the increase in salary (using some online calculators for help), but is there a grace amount of underpayment you can get away with without penalty, just in case?
 

EKKC

Diamond Member
May 31, 2005
5,895
0
0
i will pay 30k in taxes this year, i doubt i will have the cash come tax time. i probably spent it all on stocks, booze, whores, and weeds.
 

Tantrix

Banned
Apr 7, 2004
66
0
0
Originally posted by: Specop 007
I think the American public has become insensitive to taxes. Come tax time you hear about how people are looking forward to their return. They forget that throughout the year they've been paying taxes steadily. Its a shame when people look forward to tax time.
I think it should be forbidden to have taxes taken out as you go through the year. You should recieve all your earnings, then at the end of the year file your taxes.

If people started to have to write a check for 3, 4, 5 thousand or more dollars every April 15th they may pay a bit more attention to taxes and where the money was going. As it stands now taxes are considered a niusance, the deficit "just a number".

No more pay as you go with taxes I say.

If you don't want to, you don't have to have any taxes withheld out of your checks. Just get 100% of your check and pay in at the end of the year. Some people do that, but most have it taken out all during the year.

It really has nothing to do with your tax return, because you are either eligable for a return or you're not....that is all determined by your dependents.

For example:

1) You make $3k a month, DO pay taxes all during the year and are single with no children = no dependents, no return. Get used to taking it from behind if you are single and make good money.

2) You make $3k a month, DO pay taxes all during the year but are married, have 3 kids, and the wife stays home with them = head of household, with 4 dependents. You get a nice return back every tax season.

3) You make $3k a month, DON'T pay any taxes during the year and are single with no children = no dependents, no return. But since you didn't pay all year you now have to figure up how much state/fed taxes you have to pay in. Don't pay, have all your assets seized and/or go to jail.


If you are married with kids and your wife stays home with them you really rack up during tax time. Single unmarried man with no kids and make good money? Get ready for uncle sam to rip you a new one.
 

Extelleron

Diamond Member
Dec 26, 2005
3,127
0
71
Originally posted by: EKKC
i will pay 30k in taxes this year, i doubt i will have the cash come tax time. i probably spent it all on stocks, booze, whores, and weeds.

Holy..........:Q

What do you make, 150k/yr?
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,354
8,444
126
Originally posted by: TheNinja
Ya, I guess it would still get confusing. I'm just thinking of "income" in the generic sense and we can do away with all the deductions, etc. You should only pay n% of your income when you earn it the first time, not if you earn more money on the money you already paid taxes on (like capital gains, etc.).

that's a wealth increase and therefore income, is it not?

what you want is a payroll tax.
 

mrSHEiK124

Lifer
Mar 6, 2004
11,488
2
0
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: mrSHEiK124
Flame elsewhere bitch, both the Palestinian people and African people in the poorer regions of Africa are in a gigantic humanitarian crisis ATM and it'd be stupid to just sit by and watch tons of people die. If you don't like it, go whine to your representative or senator.

Is that my fault? Why must I pay for every poor downtrodden Joe in the entire world. Not my problem.
And since we're getting off topic, why the hell do I want to give money to my enemies? Maybe, just MAYBE, some of these people would be a bit nicer if they realized how much we give them. Lets cut all our aid to say Palestine and see if maybe they dont stop to think for a minute that maybe blowing up the hand that feeds them aint such a hot idea.

Aid to Palestine's been cut big time since Hamas won the election, USAID stopped loads of projects that they were working on in the West Bank and Gaza. I saw this first hand, roads that were supposed to be repaved and were already remarked to have traffic flow only on one side as they worked on the other (this road hasn't been paved since the 1980s when Israel declared Jerusalem the capital of Israel) had all work stopped as soon as Hamas won. There goes one part of your issue, secondly, if you have such a problem with it, do something about it. Senators and representatives do exist for a reason...

On top of that, aid to Palestine, Africa, and anywhere else is the LEAST of our governments budget problems. If we weren't fighting two simultaneous wars we didn't have to, all those American troops would still have their lives and wouldn't have lost them fighting a stupid cause for a stupid President; and we'd have sh!tloads of extra monies. What WMDs? Did they find Bin Laden yet?
 

Extelleron

Diamond Member
Dec 26, 2005
3,127
0
71
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: Extelleron
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: Extelleron
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Extelleron
I'm too young to pay taxes other than sales tax (buying online FTW) but in all honesty my parents have no idea how much they pay for taxes. It's truly a wonder to me why people don't pay more attention to where a large percentage of their money is going.

you're supposed to remit taxes from online purchases back to your state. all you're doing is breaking the law.

You don't pay taxes on any online goods unless the person you're buying from is in your own state..........

Upfront, no.

In most states, there is what's called a Use Tax. You must pay to your state the difference between the tax you were charged and what you would've been in the state that the product is going to be "used" the most.

Can't say I've ever heard of that before. And how exactly would you do that anyway? Write the state a check and sent it their way? ;)

For you:
http://www.revenue.state.pa.us/revenue/cwp/view.asp?a=11&q=48828

http://www.revenue.state.pa.us/revenue/...#search=%22pennsylvania%20use%20tax%22

It's OK to be ignorant on a subject. We all are when it comes to certain things. Now you've got the information to do something about it.

I think I'll stay ignorant on this one. :p
 

Extelleron

Diamond Member
Dec 26, 2005
3,127
0
71
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Extelleron
I think I'll stay ignorant on this one. :p

ignorance of the law is no defense

Considering I've never even HEARD, HEARD of a "Use Tax" before, I think a claim to ignorance here is a good defense.

 
Dec 10, 2005
24,965
8,187
136
Originally posted by: Extelleron
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Extelleron
I think I'll stay ignorant on this one. :p

ignorance of the law is no defense

Considering I've never even HEARD, HEARD of a "Use Tax" before, I think a claim to ignorance here is a good defense.

I don't know about that. If the government came and audited your state tax return, you could get f***ed over big time with use-tax. There are articles in newspapers every now and then. Also, states have been working together to make it easier for online businesses to collect taxes (the only reason they didn't initially was because the various tax laws of states created an undue burden on the businesses, but since state tax laws have consolidated and somewhat match each other now, things could start to change).
 

KK

Lifer
Jan 2, 2001
15,903
4
81
Originally posted by: mrSHEiK124
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: mrSHEiK124
Flame elsewhere bitch, both the Palestinian people and African people in the poorer regions of Africa are in a gigantic humanitarian crisis ATM and it'd be stupid to just sit by and watch tons of people die. If you don't like it, go whine to your representative or senator.

Is that my fault? Why must I pay for every poor downtrodden Joe in the entire world. Not my problem.
And since we're getting off topic, why the hell do I want to give money to my enemies? Maybe, just MAYBE, some of these people would be a bit nicer if they realized how much we give them. Lets cut all our aid to say Palestine and see if maybe they dont stop to think for a minute that maybe blowing up the hand that feeds them aint such a hot idea.

Aid to Palestine's been cut big time since Hamas won the election, USAID stopped loads of projects that they were working on in the West Bank and Gaza. I saw this first hand, roads that were supposed to be repaved and were already remarked to have traffic flow only on one side as they worked on the other (this road hasn't been paved since the 1980s when Israel declared Jerusalem the capital of Israel) had all work stopped as soon as Hamas won. There goes one part of your issue, secondly, if you have such a problem with it, do something about it. Senators and representatives do exist for a reason...

On top of that, aid to Palestine, Africa, and anywhere else is the LEAST of our governments budget problems. If we weren't fighting two simultaneous wars we didn't have to, all those American troops would still have their lives and wouldn't have lost them fighting a stupid cause for a stupid President; and we'd have sh!tloads of extra monies. What WMDs? Did they find Bin Laden yet?

Go blow yourself up and save us the bullsh1t you're spewing from your terroristic ass.
 

mrSHEiK124

Lifer
Mar 6, 2004
11,488
2
0
Originally posted by: KK
Originally posted by: mrSHEiK124
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: mrSHEiK124
Flame elsewhere bitch, both the Palestinian people and African people in the poorer regions of Africa are in a gigantic humanitarian crisis ATM and it'd be stupid to just sit by and watch tons of people die. If you don't like it, go whine to your representative or senator.

Is that my fault? Why must I pay for every poor downtrodden Joe in the entire world. Not my problem.
And since we're getting off topic, why the hell do I want to give money to my enemies? Maybe, just MAYBE, some of these people would be a bit nicer if they realized how much we give them. Lets cut all our aid to say Palestine and see if maybe they dont stop to think for a minute that maybe blowing up the hand that feeds them aint such a hot idea.

Aid to Palestine's been cut big time since Hamas won the election, USAID stopped loads of projects that they were working on in the West Bank and Gaza. I saw this first hand, roads that were supposed to be repaved and were already remarked to have traffic flow only on one side as they worked on the other (this road hasn't been paved since the 1980s when Israel declared Jerusalem the capital of Israel) had all work stopped as soon as Hamas won. There goes one part of your issue, secondly, if you have such a problem with it, do something about it. Senators and representatives do exist for a reason...

On top of that, aid to Palestine, Africa, and anywhere else is the LEAST of our governments budget problems. If we weren't fighting two simultaneous wars we didn't have to, all those American troops would still have their lives and wouldn't have lost them fighting a stupid cause for a stupid President; and we'd have sh!tloads of extra monies. What WMDs? Did they find Bin Laden yet?

Go blow yourself up and save us the bullsh1t you're spewing from your terroristic ass.

Excuse me for being rational :roll:
 

fitzov

Platinum Member
Jan 3, 2004
2,477
0
0
Originally posted by: silverpig
I know in Canada you can request your employer to not take off taxes. Maybe you can down in the US too?

Only if you were exempt the previous year, I believe.