- Mar 20, 2000
- 102,354
- 8,444
- 126
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: TheNinja
I understand what you are saying. However most people are not smart enough to budget properly. They would just spend their money on all sorts of crap, then come time to pay taxes they would not have any money. Then more tax money would be required for the IRS to go after these people. I would just rather see a flat tax...You pay n% of what your earned, that's it.
that's great, but is it a flat income tax? that'll get rid of some of the complexity, but a lot of the complexity is just figuring out what the hell is income. obviously, income can be easily defined as a realized increase in wealth. but how to apply it is the devil.
Originally posted by: Extelleron
I'm too young to pay taxes other than sales tax (buying online FTW) but in all honesty my parents have no idea how much they pay for taxes. It's truly a wonder to me why people don't pay more attention to where a large percentage of their money is going.
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Extelleron
I'm too young to pay taxes other than sales tax (buying online FTW) but in all honesty my parents have no idea how much they pay for taxes. It's truly a wonder to me why people don't pay more attention to where a large percentage of their money is going.
you're supposed to remit taxes from online purchases back to your state. all you're doing is breaking the law.
Originally posted by: silverpig
I know in Canada you can request your employer to not take off taxes. Maybe you can down in the US too?
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: TheNinja
I understand what you are saying. However most people are not smart enough to budget properly. They would just spend their money on all sorts of crap, then come time to pay taxes they would not have any money. Then more tax money would be required for the IRS to go after these people. I would just rather see a flat tax...You pay n% of what your earned, that's it.
that's great, but is it a flat income tax? that'll get rid of some of the complexity, but a lot of the complexity is just figuring out what the hell is income. obviously, income can be easily defined as a realized increase in wealth. but how to apply it is the devil.
Originally posted by: jpeyton
You guys elected him, now deal with the deficit spending.
Actually, it's more like deficit gorging.
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: jpeyton
You guys elected him, now deal with the deficit spending.
Actually, it's more like deficit gorging.
What the hell are you talking about? Taxes have been around since we were under British rule, which is one of the reasons we threw a little tea party.
Remember the whole "Taxation without Representation" thing?
Originally posted by: TheNinja
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: jpeyton
You guys elected him, now deal with the deficit spending.
Actually, it's more like deficit gorging.
What the hell are you talking about? Taxes have been around since we were under British rule, which is one of the reasons we threw a little tea party.
Remember the whole "Taxation without Representation" thing?
Check out his sig...it's pretty obvious he's one of those people who will probably try to blame the Civil War on Bush among other things.
Originally posted by: Bateluer
I agree with you, however it'd most likely lead to a lot of IRS indictments and people going to jail for not paying their taxes.
Sadly, a lot of people in this country don't understand how to save money.
Originally posted by: TheNinja
another thing that pisses me off and backs up the idea of flat tax is that 65% of your tax money goes to the IRS in order for them to collect, administrate, and audit taxes. Why not go to flat tax and give IRS like 10% b/c their jobs would be significantly easier. Therefore everyone would have to pay less taxes overall
ELECT THENINJA!!!!!
Originally posted by: TheNinja
another thing that pisses me off and backs up the idea of flat tax is that 65% of your tax money goes to the IRS in order for them to collect, administrate, and audit taxes. Why not go to flat tax and give IRS like 10% b/c their jobs would be significantly easier. Therefore everyone would have to pay less taxes overall
ELECT THENINJA!!!!!
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: TheNinja
another thing that pisses me off and backs up the idea of flat tax is that 65% of your tax money goes to the IRS in order for them to collect, administrate, and audit taxes. Why not go to flat tax and give IRS like 10% b/c their jobs would be significantly easier. Therefore everyone would have to pay less taxes overall
ELECT THENINJA!!!!!
The flat tax is a regressive tax. It will only lead to the rich getting richer, and the poor getting poorer. We have enough of that in this day and age, we don't need more of it.
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: TheNinja
another thing that pisses me off and backs up the idea of flat tax is that 65% of your tax money goes to the IRS in order for them to collect, administrate, and audit taxes. Why not go to flat tax and give IRS like 10% b/c their jobs would be significantly easier. Therefore everyone would have to pay less taxes overall
ELECT THENINJA!!!!!
The flat tax is a regressive tax. It will only lead to the rich getting richer, and the poor getting poorer. We have enough of that in this day and age, we don't need more of it.
What the hell are you talking about?
Its a FAIR tax, and poor people dont want to be treated FAIRLY, they want special treatment.
