People should be forbidden to have tax money taken out of their paychecks

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Specop 007

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
9,454
0
0
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: TheNinja
I understand what you are saying. However most people are not smart enough to budget properly. They would just spend their money on all sorts of crap, then come time to pay taxes they would not have any money. Then more tax money would be required for the IRS to go after these people. I would just rather see a flat tax...You pay n% of what your earned, that's it.

that's great, but is it a flat income tax? that'll get rid of some of the complexity, but a lot of the complexity is just figuring out what the hell is income. obviously, income can be easily defined as a realized increase in wealth. but how to apply it is the devil.

Dont get me started.
I'm taxed when I earn my money. I'm taxed if I save my money. I'm taxed if I spend my money. And in some cases, I'm taxed on the item that my money bought!!

TAXES!!
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,354
8,444
126
Originally posted by: Extelleron
I'm too young to pay taxes other than sales tax (buying online FTW) but in all honesty my parents have no idea how much they pay for taxes. It's truly a wonder to me why people don't pay more attention to where a large percentage of their money is going.

you're supposed to remit taxes from online purchases back to your state. all you're doing is breaking the law.
 

BlancoNino

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2005
5,695
0
0
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Extelleron
I'm too young to pay taxes other than sales tax (buying online FTW) but in all honesty my parents have no idea how much they pay for taxes. It's truly a wonder to me why people don't pay more attention to where a large percentage of their money is going.

you're supposed to remit taxes from online purchases back to your state. all you're doing is breaking the law.

rofl.
 

KK

Lifer
Jan 2, 2001
15,903
4
81
Originally posted by: silverpig
I know in Canada you can request your employer to not take off taxes. Maybe you can down in the US too?

Yeah down here, you get penalized if you don't pay enough thoughout the year. Now that's fvcked up. I wish the politicians would just shoot themselves, atleast then they'd be doing something good for the nation.
 

jjones

Lifer
Oct 9, 2001
15,424
2
0
Tax withholding was just a temporary measure during world war 2 I believe. As with all federal "temporary" measures, it became permanent. That'w why I always laugh when people say, "oh, but it's just temporary", when talking about some new swindle the government wants to pull on its citizens.
 

TheNinja

Lifer
Jan 22, 2003
12,207
1
0
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: TheNinja
I understand what you are saying. However most people are not smart enough to budget properly. They would just spend their money on all sorts of crap, then come time to pay taxes they would not have any money. Then more tax money would be required for the IRS to go after these people. I would just rather see a flat tax...You pay n% of what your earned, that's it.

that's great, but is it a flat income tax? that'll get rid of some of the complexity, but a lot of the complexity is just figuring out what the hell is income. obviously, income can be easily defined as a realized increase in wealth. but how to apply it is the devil.

Ya, I guess it would still get confusing. I'm just thinking of "income" in the generic sense and we can do away with all the deductions, etc. You should only pay n% of your income when you earn it the first time, not if you earn more money on the money you already paid taxes on (like capital gains, etc.).
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
You guys elected him, now deal with the deficit spending.

Actually, it's more like deficit gorging.
 

DAGTA

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
8,172
1
0
Agreed. It would also help people learn to be more responsible with their own money. I hate writing out my quarterly checks to federal piggy.
 

Specop 007

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
9,454
0
0
Originally posted by: jpeyton
You guys elected him, now deal with the deficit spending.

Actually, it's more like deficit gorging.

What the hell are you talking about? Taxes have been around since we were under British rule, which is one of the reasons we threw a little tea party.
Remember the whole "Taxation without Representation" thing?
 

TheNinja

Lifer
Jan 22, 2003
12,207
1
0
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: jpeyton
You guys elected him, now deal with the deficit spending.

Actually, it's more like deficit gorging.

What the hell are you talking about? Taxes have been around since we were under British rule, which is one of the reasons we threw a little tea party.
Remember the whole "Taxation without Representation" thing?

Check out his sig...it's pretty obvious he's one of those people who will probably try to blame the Civil War on Bush among other things.
 

Specop 007

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
9,454
0
0
Originally posted by: TheNinja
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: jpeyton
You guys elected him, now deal with the deficit spending.

Actually, it's more like deficit gorging.

What the hell are you talking about? Taxes have been around since we were under British rule, which is one of the reasons we threw a little tea party.
Remember the whole "Taxation without Representation" thing?

Check out his sig...it's pretty obvious he's one of those people who will probably try to blame the Civil War on Bush among other things.

Oh. Of course. Bush is the reason I pay taxes.
How silly of me to overlook that. :disgust:

Truth be told, I dont mind having my tax money go to war. I DONT like it going to social programs that support giving handouts instead of handups, or aid that goes to hostile foreign countries such as Palestine and aid to African countries.

But the point isnt where or where not tax money should be spent, but rather that people should care a bit more about taxes. And one way to get people to wake up to taxes and thus how the money is spent is by removing pay as you go.
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Problem is most people wouldn't save enough money throughout the year, the federal government wouldn't have any money to operate, and Canada would come down with their tank and take over.
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
166
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
You see, I look forward to tax season, because it's then that I get my money back. You can't tell your employer to "don't withhold anything."

Unlike the typical person who works one job, and that's it, I have a more complicated return (getting much more complicated lately!)
I have all sorts of business expenses to write off (Like 2398.7 miles I drove last week to pick up 4 goats) That's at how many cents per mile? Almost 50? Having a farm, I get to begin to depreciate certain equipment. Since I'm a landlord for another home I own, I get to depreciate stuff there, write off mileage to and from that house, write off any routine maintenance I do to the house, etc. I don't tell my employer to withhold extra, so I get a big return... I have a lot of deductions and get a big return. Let's not forget about the 1/8th of my home which serves as an office for our farm, as well as a portion of our utilities, etc. Heck, if I had to drill a hole at the house I rent out, and purchased a $200 drill to do the job, that's tax deductible (I believe). So, come February, I'll pay for a good accountant to do my taxes for me, make sure I deduct everything I'm allowed to deduct (but not deduct anything I actually can't or shouldn't), and I end up getting more of my money back than someone else with the same income and withholdings.


 

TXHokie

Platinum Member
Nov 16, 1999
2,557
173
106
I'm probably a small minority but I consider paying my share of taxes a great deal for me because look at all I get:
- I get to live in the greatest country in the world
- Freedom ain't free
- I get to go anywhere I want whenever I please, drive on nice roads, use public services
- I'm defended by the greatest armed force in the world (yeah, that F-16, I paid for some of that)
- The more I work, the more I make, the more I can enjoy - nobody can confiscate my stuff for no reason
Yeah so the system isn't all perfect and it could be better but it's still a great deal. For those of you who have never lived in a country with oppressive government, you probably have no idea.
 

BD2003

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
16,815
1
81
Originally posted by: Bateluer
I agree with you, however it'd most likely lead to a lot of IRS indictments and people going to jail for not paying their taxes.

Sadly, a lot of people in this country don't understand how to save money.

Yup. Idea is sort of in the right place, but completely and utterly impractical.
 

BD2003

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
16,815
1
81
Originally posted by: TheNinja
another thing that pisses me off and backs up the idea of flat tax is that 65% of your tax money goes to the IRS in order for them to collect, administrate, and audit taxes. Why not go to flat tax and give IRS like 10% b/c their jobs would be significantly easier. Therefore everyone would have to pay less taxes overall


ELECT THENINJA!!!!!

The flat tax is a regressive tax. It will only lead to the rich getting richer, and the poor getting poorer. We have enough of that in this day and age, we don't need more of it.
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91

Originally posted by: TheNinja
another thing that pisses me off and backs up the idea of flat tax is that 65% of your tax money goes to the IRS in order for them to collect, administrate, and audit taxes. Why not go to flat tax and give IRS like 10% b/c their jobs would be significantly easier. Therefore everyone would have to pay less taxes overall


ELECT THENINJA!!!!!


65% is spent on the IRS? :confused: That's like $1 trillion per year. You sure about that?
 

Specop 007

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
9,454
0
0
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: TheNinja
another thing that pisses me off and backs up the idea of flat tax is that 65% of your tax money goes to the IRS in order for them to collect, administrate, and audit taxes. Why not go to flat tax and give IRS like 10% b/c their jobs would be significantly easier. Therefore everyone would have to pay less taxes overall


ELECT THENINJA!!!!!

The flat tax is a regressive tax. It will only lead to the rich getting richer, and the poor getting poorer. We have enough of that in this day and age, we don't need more of it.

:confused:

What the hell are you talking about?
Its a FAIR tax, and poor people dont want to be treated FAIRLY, they want special treatment.
 

BD2003

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
16,815
1
81
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: TheNinja
another thing that pisses me off and backs up the idea of flat tax is that 65% of your tax money goes to the IRS in order for them to collect, administrate, and audit taxes. Why not go to flat tax and give IRS like 10% b/c their jobs would be significantly easier. Therefore everyone would have to pay less taxes overall


ELECT THENINJA!!!!!

The flat tax is a regressive tax. It will only lead to the rich getting richer, and the poor getting poorer. We have enough of that in this day and age, we don't need more of it.

:confused:

What the hell are you talking about?
Its a FAIR tax, and poor people dont want to be treated FAIRLY, they want special treatment.

Real convenient for you to say. As long as you capitalize it, it become truth. It may be an equal tax, but its not fair, or just.

We have tax brackets for a reason. Rich people can and should be rich, but there needs to be a limit to this, or else it is greed, greed that spirals wildly out of control. The richest of people make money not on what they do, but on compound interest from the money they or their parents have saved. With your *fair* tax, none of that would be taxed. It grows to ridiculous amounts, and the cycle just continues. More money goes to the people who have money.

Those that don't have the money, those that have to live check to check, will be adversely affected. Rather than paying a lower amount of tax because they're barely scraping by, will get hit on the head with a disproportionate burden. They're paying the same percentage, but they need that money far far more than the wealthy who complains that he only gained 1 million instead of 1.5 million in the stock market last year. Boo hoo....he's not starving, and because his money is making his money, essentially his earnings are coming from those working blokes who are now paying more and earning less while he works less and earns more.

Sure, you could argue that anyone could invest, which is true - but the flat tax raises the barrier of entry even further.

The rich are the largest contributors, ignoring corporate tax. Yet they still remain rich. You don't hear a lot of stories nowadays how the wealthier are getting less wealthy...quite the opposite. Flat tax = less tax from rich, so to make up the shortfall, it comes from the poor.

Might as well forget about charitable deductions, educational or child credits. Just what we need, a nation of even poorer people, less charity, less education, and less children (that last one is arguable).

What a fantastic idea. I wonder why we haven't implemented it yet.