- Aug 6, 2001
- 14
- 0
- 0
i only recently noticed this after i ordered the logitech mx1000 mouse.
i'm not talking about the lag associated with taking the mouse off of the surface and replacing it, that lag happens independent of what computer it's connected to (due to the laser turning off and on).
what i am talking about is a sluggish delay (very slight) but noticeable if you pay close attention.
at first i thought it was the mouse because it was wireless... my roommate has a pentium 4 3.0 ghz computer so i tried it there and it doesn't happen there.
i was still doubtful that it was my system cuz (as you can see from my sig) my system is solid. so i decided to do a test... my canon sd300 has a 60 frames per second mode that can be viewed in slow motion or frame by frame... i placed my mouse directly in front of my monitor and recorded the movement of the mouse and the cursor as i wiggled my moues left and right a few times (all captured clearly on the camera). from watching the video in slow motion, you can see that upon direction change my hand and mouse would physically start moving before the cursor on the screen. there was about a 2-3 frame delay. i mirrored this test on my rooommate's pentium 4 (and even my pentium 4 mobile without hyperthreading) and the lag is not there... of course there is an occasional 1 frame delay due to synching the frames with the direction change... but it was clearly more better.
after this, i started noticing how simple applications (explorer, firefox, internet explorer, windows media player) loaded slower and was just a bit laggier on my monster athlon 64 than my roommate's stock p4.
is this common?
were any of you aware of this?
is intel's hyperthreading technology this good?
furthermore, when i move on to a dual core Athlon64 X2, will this lag disappear or at least be mollified?
i've since repeated my test with other mice to see the same results (an ibm optical, and the logitech mx518-which is btw, the best mouse i've ever used for gaming).
thoughts?
i'm not talking about the lag associated with taking the mouse off of the surface and replacing it, that lag happens independent of what computer it's connected to (due to the laser turning off and on).
what i am talking about is a sluggish delay (very slight) but noticeable if you pay close attention.
at first i thought it was the mouse because it was wireless... my roommate has a pentium 4 3.0 ghz computer so i tried it there and it doesn't happen there.
i was still doubtful that it was my system cuz (as you can see from my sig) my system is solid. so i decided to do a test... my canon sd300 has a 60 frames per second mode that can be viewed in slow motion or frame by frame... i placed my mouse directly in front of my monitor and recorded the movement of the mouse and the cursor as i wiggled my moues left and right a few times (all captured clearly on the camera). from watching the video in slow motion, you can see that upon direction change my hand and mouse would physically start moving before the cursor on the screen. there was about a 2-3 frame delay. i mirrored this test on my rooommate's pentium 4 (and even my pentium 4 mobile without hyperthreading) and the lag is not there... of course there is an occasional 1 frame delay due to synching the frames with the direction change... but it was clearly more better.
after this, i started noticing how simple applications (explorer, firefox, internet explorer, windows media player) loaded slower and was just a bit laggier on my monster athlon 64 than my roommate's stock p4.
is this common?
were any of you aware of this?
is intel's hyperthreading technology this good?
furthermore, when i move on to a dual core Athlon64 X2, will this lag disappear or at least be mollified?
i've since repeated my test with other mice to see the same results (an ibm optical, and the logitech mx518-which is btw, the best mouse i've ever used for gaming).
thoughts?