interesting strategy with no live view on the K200D. that could be ok or it could bite them against the 450D. i guess the A200 doesn't have it either.
for some reason the K20D looks like a really wide camera. maybe it's just the perspective of dpreview's
image combined with the short proportions of the pentax 50/1.4
so, to compare the new sub $1000 cameras:
A200:
10.2 MP CCD
30 - 1/4000 shutter speed
9 area AF (center cross type)
ISO 3200
dynamic range optimization
2.7" 320x240 LCD
3 fps jpeg unlimited, 3 fps raw for 6 frames
proprietary battery
battery grip available
.83 95% viewfinder(294 mm sq)
CCD shake dust reduction
CCD shift stabilization
CF cards
5.2x3.7x2.8 inches
1.2 lbs without battery
$700 with 18-70 kit lens
K200:
10.2 MP CCD (same sensor probably)
30-1/4000 shutter speed
11 point AF
ISO 1600 max (available in 1, 1/2, and 1/3 stops)
compressed raw and dng formats
2.7" 320x240 LCD
2.8 fps jpeg and raw, 4 frames, 1.1 unlimited jpeg
AA batteries
battery grip available
.85 96% viewfinder (301 mm sq)
CCD shake dust reduction and dust alert function
CCD shift stabilization
SD cards
5.2x3.7x2.9 inches
1.4 lbs without battery
$800 with 18-55 kit lens
Rebel XSi/450D:
12.2 MP CMOS
30-1/4000 shutter speed
9 point AF with f/2.8 center cross type
ISO 1600 max (highlight tone priority available)
4% spot meter
14 bit raw
3" 320x240 LCD
live view with both phase and contrast detect AF
3.5 fps for 53 jpeg or 6 raw
bigger battery than 400D
.87 95% viewfinder (271 mm sq, old was 249)
low pass filter vibration
SD cards
5.1x3.9x2.4 inches
1 lb without battery
"improved grip"
$799 body/$899 with 18-55IS
between the A200 and the K200, the A200 will sell better. they're basically the same camera. more people have probably heard of sony these days. the pentax costs $100 more. and you know the sony will have ISO 3200 labeled prominently ("so does that mean i can take pictures in the dark with my f/3.5 lens?"). i'll bet the pentax is built better.
well things just got interesting. canon stays a step ahead with a couple more MP (probably not worth much, but joe shmoe doesn't know that). canon also adds in live view with both phase detect and the contrast detect they left out of the 40D. much as certain people around here pooh-pooh live view, i think it is a killer feature for the person making decisions at best buy, circuit city, fry's, wherever. they're going to look at the other compact SLRs cameras and think "well, that one can't even show the image on the back LCD like all those little pocket cameras, why would i spend three to four times the price and not get it?" if they were all the same price, the XSi is the one to get (assuming the grip actually has improved). for $200 more, i think the added couple of MP and live view will sway a lot of regular joes.
now to see what nikon has in store with an updated D40x (er, D60) and a D80s/D90. i'll bet sony's 12,2 MP CMOS doesn't show up in the D60, though it might make an appearance in a D80 successor.