- Apr 9, 2002
- 209
- 0
- 0
I'm leaning towards the K10D, I wouldn't mind shooting in RAW most of the time and then running it through The GIMP (w/ UFRaw) or Photoshop. I miss working with images after the shot is taken, as I did in the darkroom back in highschool.
I have an old 35mm Canon Rebel w/ two lenses, and I was wondering if they would work on the Rebel XTi? That would certainly be nice. It would also weigh heavily in the XTi's favor, as I already have two lenses, one of which is 70-300mm. I'd have to buy one of those for the K10D.
I like shooting in low light conditions, and shooting candids, and being able to get good shots without a flash is important to me. What's better for this - image stabilization, or less noise at higher ISOs? Also, does the in-camera noise reduction get applied to RAW images?
I did photography in high school for 3 years, although that was a little while ago, so I'd rate myself a little above amateur. Also, the whole point of my getting a digital SLR is to resurrect this old hobby as a new hobby, so I *want* to play around.
From what I can tell, the XTi has better in-camera JPG image quality than the K10D. What's the general consensus on K10D RAW image quality vs. XTi RAW image quality?
If spending more up front to get the K10D kit plus a longer zoom means doing it right, I'm all for it. But if the XTi would suit my needs just fine, it makes more sense to go for that.
I have an old 35mm Canon Rebel w/ two lenses, and I was wondering if they would work on the Rebel XTi? That would certainly be nice. It would also weigh heavily in the XTi's favor, as I already have two lenses, one of which is 70-300mm. I'd have to buy one of those for the K10D.
I like shooting in low light conditions, and shooting candids, and being able to get good shots without a flash is important to me. What's better for this - image stabilization, or less noise at higher ISOs? Also, does the in-camera noise reduction get applied to RAW images?
I did photography in high school for 3 years, although that was a little while ago, so I'd rate myself a little above amateur. Also, the whole point of my getting a digital SLR is to resurrect this old hobby as a new hobby, so I *want* to play around.
From what I can tell, the XTi has better in-camera JPG image quality than the K10D. What's the general consensus on K10D RAW image quality vs. XTi RAW image quality?
If spending more up front to get the K10D kit plus a longer zoom means doing it right, I'm all for it. But if the XTi would suit my needs just fine, it makes more sense to go for that.
