1) You obviously don't know much about metal, fire, fuel and airplanes. You probably shouldn't base opinions on ignorance.Originally posted by: Maverick2002
After reading that oh so convincing article refuting this "myth", I still have a few questions, and pardon my ignorance if you will. 1) how could most of the plane, especially the metal sections, burn away? I mean, take a look at cars - they too use fuel and a burning/blown up car doesn't just go *poof*. Granted, this is a much larger car moving a lot faster, but still. 2) I would think the lawn, as pointed out in those photographs, would be in a lot worse shape if the plane did indeed shatter into tiny burning fragments - that's a lot of fuel to burn. Just my thoughts. No need to bash *cough* GagHalfrunt *cough* ignorance *cough*.
EDIT: and what about the other engine?
In general, I'm not an conspiracy paranoid type but I certainly don't believe half the stuff I see in the news, at least not to their fullest extent.
2) The plane didn't explode on the lawn.
