Peltier kits ??

302efi

Golden Member
Jul 16, 2004
1,539
1
81
I was just browsing the the net and I came across this : Peltier Elements

Whats the deal with these ??..Looks pretty serious and better (cooler) then water cooling ??
 

LifeStealer

Senior member
Sep 22, 2004
706
0
0
Excluding the fact that only one side is cool and the other side needs a heatsink sitting on top of it w/fan and the moisture factor, its better. Maybe.

Best option is to use it with a watercooling system to cool the radiator.
 

302efi

Golden Member
Jul 16, 2004
1,539
1
81
Yeah I think the moisture factor would be a problem...Good idea to use it to cool the radiator:)
 

jbh129

Senior member
Oct 8, 2004
252
0
0
Peltiers were in much favor before processors began using so many watts. Nowadays, they have generally been abandoned for phase change and dry ice when it comes to extreme cooling.
 
Aug 27, 2002
10,043
2
0
I recall reading somewhere recently that you pretty much have to watercool a pelt to get it to work well for cpu cooling.
 

DacJames

Junior Member
Jan 27, 2005
2
0
0
Yeah from what i've read, you normally put the pelts beneath the water pump to act as a sort of "heat pump." I'm thinking about trying it on my next rig, but it's hard to find a PSU that'll supply the neccesary 250+ watts @12+v
 

iamtrout

Diamond Member
Nov 21, 2001
3,001
1
0
No, no. Peltiers are supposed to be sandwiched between a waterblock and a CPU. The cold side touches the CPU through a coldplate, and the hot side contacts the waterblock and gets its cooling from the watercooling. Power consumption of a peltier is a huge concern since the lower end ones, IIRC, require about 75W of power and the higher end ones can go over 150W. I could be wrong on the wattages though, although I've seen systems with a second PSU just so that a peltier wouldn't kill the whole system with its power requirements.
 

Blain

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
23,643
3
81
With CPU wattages getting so high these days, it's not as practical to use peltiers as it once was.
The bottom line is that a ton of heat must be dumped off somewhere.
 

BonzaiDuck

Lifer
Jun 30, 2004
16,435
1,934
126
I found a "white-paper" on TEC tech a week or two ago.

All About TEC (Go to the Peltier link in the left-hand column).

The gist of it seems to be this. Given the additional heat generated by the TEC cooler itself, they have graphed various combinations of heatsink thermal resistance (C/W) against thermal design power (load-level heat dissipation) of a processor. There are particular ranges of combinations -- heatsinks and processors -- where TEC is feasible and effective. But with TDP's in excess of 60W and heatsink thermal resistance below (perhaps) 0.20 C/W, it is totally useless to consider TEC.

Then, you add in the water-cooling alternative. This again makes TEC feasible with TDP's in excess of 70W or so (as one finds with the more recent AMD and Intel offerings). So you will find water-blocks manufactured with an integrated TEC hot-and-cold plate unit.

Again, though, there is another complication for this exotic cooling enhancement. The TEC device needs a lot of power supplied to it to move the heat ( with electrons) across the hot-plate-cold-plate boundary. You are not going to get an adequate supply of power from your PSU, or if you do, it is really going to put a strain on it. Further, some of these devices require a 24V potential difference as opposed to 12V. On manufacturer actually recommends buying two of a particular model PSU and stringing them up in series. So you are not only faced with the additional power consumption that these devices require, but a place to put the additiional PSU(s) that drive the devices.

Swiftech manufactures another device that includes a cooling loop for "chilled water" cooling of the CPU. The water passes across the cold-plate side of a TEC cooler. On the hot-plate side, another cooling loop runs water through the radiator -- removing both the TEC's heat and the heat from the water of the CPU loop. Again, there is the issue of powering the unit, and the simple fact that there are certain inefficiencies of introducing the TEC cooler in the mix. Even so, you can effectively reduce the CPU temperature below room ambient. I THINK that reductions to a level of a few degrees above freezing are possible with the TEC device applied directly to the water-block.

Again, because you are reducing CPU temperatures to near-freezing, or at least below room-ambient, there is the problem that the temperature will fall below the dew-point and cause condensation around the CPU socket, so you need to use a neoprene gasket to avoid the risk of water-droplets shorting out your precious components.

I think if i move to water-cooling, I will probably defer introducing TEC tech into the cooling loop. And I may defer it indefinitely -- longer than I seem to be deferring the move from air to water cooling.
 
Jan 9, 2001
704
0
0
A very informative post. Its rather ironic but as I was sitting in my electronics class tryin to keep from falling asleep I was wondering what happened to peliters. I remember when they were the rage when the socket veriosn of the P3 Coppermine was shipping. I actually used one with my P3 700@1.1ghz back in the day. As far as the condensation issue, any water produced by the peliter would basicly be deionzed, so the chance of it actually shorting something out would be quite low, however it is a scary thought. I actually stopped using mine during the winter time due to the temps getting so low during the niight.