• Guest, The rules for the P & N subforum have been updated to prohibit "ad hominem" or personal attacks against other posters. See the full details in the post "Politics and News Rules & Guidelines."

Pee-Wee Herman Pleads Guilty, Ordered to Stay Away From Children.

BugsBunny1078

Banned
Jan 11, 2004
910
0
0
I don't see why he would be charged with possessing obscene material as long as he wasn't displaying it out in public if he wants to have obscene material in his home he should be able to.
 
May 10, 2001
2,669
0
0
Originally posted by: BugsBunny1078
I don't see why he would be charged with possessing obscene material as long as he wasn't displaying it out in public if he wants to have obscene material in his home he should be able to.
probibly a plea-bargen down on kiddy porn.
 

Cypherdude1

Member
Mar 19, 2003
116
0
0
The material Paul Reubens possessed was early 20th century photos of naked children, as I understand it. It seems the government's contention was, no matter how old the material was, it still constitutes child porn. Under federal law, no one is allowed to posses pictures of underage children.

Why was this post placed in "Off Topic" from the News Forum? This is current news, it happened a hour before I posted it. If AnandTech doesn't want this topic to be posted in their News Forum, I'll post copies everywhere else. Is the AnandTech moderator a Paul Reubens fan and doesn't want this info posted?

Originally posted by: BugsBunny1078
I don't see why he would be charged with possessing obscene material as long as he wasn't displaying it out in public if he wants to have obscene material in his home he should be able to.
 

Howard

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
47,991
9
81
Originally posted by: moshquerade
sick that this guy used to be in the entertainment business aimed towards kids.
You have the same problem toward gay Boy Scout leaders, right?
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY