PCI or USB wifi adapter?

Barfo

Lifer
Jan 4, 2005
27,539
212
106
Title says all, which one will be more convenient to use with a desktop PC running Vista 64 bit?
 

RebateMonger

Elite Member
Dec 24, 2005
11,586
0
0
PCI adapters have much better antennas and are less likely to get damaged by impact to what's sticking out of the PC.
 

JackMDS

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 25, 1999
29,510
406
126
Originally posted by: barfo
So PCI > USB?

Yeah that is the logic behind of linking you to a good inexpensive PCI. :thumbsup:


Originally posted by: RebateMonger
PCI adapters have much better antennas and are less likely to get damaged by impact to what's sticking out of the PC.

In addition a major problem with many of the current USB wireless is Heat.

Because of their structure in a small Plastic encasement they get very hot and as a result the transmission goes down.

PCI is better ventilated in the case, and most PCMCIA (for laptops) are much better designed and built than the USBs.
 

heymrdj

Diamond Member
May 28, 2007
3,999
63
91
Originally posted by: RebateMonger
PCI adapters have much better antennas and are less likely to get damaged by impact to what's sticking out of the PC.

Not true lol. I had a linksys PCI card installed in our mobile LAN party server. It got tore off in route to a LAN party 40 miles away. Replaced it with an Edimax USB adapter so I could pack in separately and not do damage like that anymore :).
 

kevnich2

Platinum Member
Apr 10, 2004
2,465
8
76
Well, personally I've gone with the WUSB54G from linksys (V4) and I've had 0 problems with them. Have them installed on 4 XP systems (no vista) and no problems. I like USB over PCI so it's easily removed or moved around if I want. Also, the CD that comes with it has just a driver folder, so I just install that and use windows to manage it, I don't use nor like the linksys wireless client. But it is on the more expensive side $50 approximately