PCI-E dremmel action.

hpglow

Junior Member
Apr 2, 2007
18
0
0
I have read around the internet that some are having limited sucess grinding out the one side of their 1x slots and putting full size cards in there to get extra GPUs folding. Has anyone here attempted this? I can't for the life of me find anyone that has done this mod that can tell me if they get their full points value or if it hurts performance too much.

I am only asking because I have 3 1x slots on my current motherboard and if I could pack in 4 9800GTs it would boost my daily score big time even if they all ran at limited capacity.
 

Evadman

Administrator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Feb 18, 2001
30,990
5
81
according to the PCI-e standard, a 16x card is supposed to work in a 1x slot, as long as it physically fits. Usually the back of the slot is open if the motherboard supports it though.
 

PCTC2

Diamond Member
Feb 18, 2007
3,892
33
91
Originally posted by: Evadman
according to the PCI-e standard, a 16x card is supposed to work in a 1x slot, as long as it physically fits. Usually the back of the slot is open if the motherboard supports it though.

It's kinda hit and miss I thought because electrically it's 16x and might not be supported because not all the pins are connected to the motherboard. It can work in a 16x slot that's 1x electrically, but I don't know about a 1x slot that's 1x electrically.
 

waffleironhead

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2005
7,046
549
136
I know from experience, from having a gpu in a x16 slot, that was only allowed to run at x1 thruput, that the performance hit was in line with the decrease in bandwidth. In other words, my card received 1/16 the performance of its normal operation. So while a card may run in a x1 slot, the performance degradation may be significant enough to make the experiment worthless from a PPD standpoint.
 

plonk420

Senior member
Feb 6, 2004
324
16
81
wasn't there an article somewhere about this? some major site somehow installed and tested PCI-e cards at 4x, 2x and 1x...? i can't seem to find it anymore
 

Fullmetal Chocobo

Moderator<br>Distributed Computing
Moderator
May 13, 2003
13,704
7
81
From what I understand and remember, I don't think it will work like you want it to. I'll try and find the articles I have read related to it though...
 

hpglow

Junior Member
Apr 2, 2007
18
0
0
Tom's did a write up on it and concluded that 4x was enough for most games. And there are some doing it in the folding forums with limited sucess but none of them have been able to give a tangible value to the amount of points they loose by using this setup. All one guy told me was that it only works well with lower end GPUs.

I may just put down the money for a board with 3X physicical 16x slots. Electronically 16x, 8x, 4x. There is one on newegg for around $120.
 

plonk420

Senior member
Feb 6, 2004
324
16
81
i'm ASSuming if the 16x slot utilizes PCI-e 2.0 standards, the rest will, too? either Asus or MSI board stats usually seem to indicate otherwise (but then again, they sometimes get specific details slightly wrong once in a while. i guess a look at the NB might be a better idea...
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,571
10,207
126
You want an MSI K9A2 Platinum. 4 PCI-E x16 slots. Only "limitation", is that it's a socket AM2+ board. I think that they have a beta BIOS that takes Phenom II chips too.
 

PCTC2

Diamond Member
Feb 18, 2007
3,892
33
91
Originally posted by: hpglow
Tom's did a write up on it and concluded that 4x was enough for most games. And there are some doing it in the folding forums with limited sucess but none of them have been able to give a tangible value to the amount of points they loose by using this setup. All one guy told me was that it only works well with lower end GPUs.

I may just put down the money for a board with 3X physicical 16x slots. Electronically 16x, 8x, 4x. There is one on newegg for around $120.

There's a lot out now. What architecture CPU do you have/want?