Game has memory leak problem.Wait for the patch for actual benchmark.
Fury X and GTX 980 Ti performance will go up after the patch.
The way I see it. Publishers issue games on release date irregardless of the state of the game.This.
Question, how do you release a new somewhat anticipated game with a serious memory leak??
The standards for being a game developer have seriously been lowered these last few years.
A 290 beating a 980 at 1080p(NV typically being stronger at lower res)?
Okay, this is the second AAA fps title after Battlefront to have somekind of pro-AMD bias. Interesting. Maybe just better AMD driver implementation as for now, rather than a structural engine reason like in the case of Battlefield.
I know 3 people playing it all day tho. And they dont seem to have encountered any issues at all. So it may be hit and miss.
EDIT: On topic: what the hell happened to this game? Them results are ATROCIOUS!!! And I actually was thinking of buying this game sans-Steams Sale. Not anymore.
From what I can tell from those playing it. Ignore these faulty benches and buy it. Or wait till after the first patch.
You can always refund on steam if it goes terrible wrong.
How the heck do these guys with so much money, manage to release games with memory leaks? Stuttering on 12GB system ram setups is nuts for the scale of the game (level based).
Sounds exactly like the BF4 release.
Its the business method behind. Failtriggers, cashflow etc.