Originally posted by: Jeff7
"The same goes for hard drives. The only magnets powerful enough to scrub data from a drive platter are laboratory degaussers or those used by government agencies to wipe bits off media."
Scrub data? Yeah, I'd say a lab degausser would be needed. Totally screw it up so that a user can't read it, or Windows says "This drive is not formatted" - then a regular magnet can do the job. That's been my experience anyway, messing around with some old junker drives.
I've never seen anyone able to affect the magnetic recordings of a fixed-disc drive, without actually opening it up. If you've actually done so, I would appreciate a writeup of the experiment. Thanks.
Originally posted by: Jeff7
"The Federal Aviation Administration, which regulates cell phone use in a plane, has a different view: "The concern is that cell phones would conflict with onboard avionics," says Paul Takemoto, the FAA's electronics guru."
My cellphone interferes with a wired answering machine that's on a completely separate line. No idea how it does that.
They fry your brain cells too.
Originally posted by: Jeff7
"We didn't check disk fragmentation because some hard-drive experts told us that defragging today's faster, bigger drives has little to no effect on performance.)"
Huh? Since when? I know NTFS is more resistant to fragmentation.
Ironically, NTFS seems to be more affected by fragmentation, than other common filesystems. (Meaning, that when it does fragment, it affects performance more than other filesystems when they get fragmented.)
That article's suggestion to not worry about shutting down PCs cleanly.. whoa. That's a load of irresponsible journalism right there. I mean, they could also say that it's generally not harmful to play in traffic too.. I mean, on a lightly-traveled road, what are the odds that a car is coming? Same analogy to "disk traffic". Stupid MSN. I'll wait until they get the infamous "SYSTEMced not found" error-message, and have to re-install Windows from scratch. Then I'll LMFAO at them.
It's bad enough that the Windows-controller ATX soft-off shutdowns can still hose a machine. :|
This one is a gem of journalism:
"Warning: The newer the microprocessor, the more susceptible it is to power spikes. The greater the number of transistors packed into a chip, the less tolerant it is of excess voltage, says Wilson. If you use an aging computer without a surge protector, it may survive a spike. A newer PC, on the other hand, will fry."
Nevermind that the voltage that the CPU sees, isn't what comes off the AC line, but what is output from the PSU, and those voltage standards haven't changed much in years. If they instead said something about PSUs of today being markedly cheaper (in terms of quality) than in years past, then they might have had a valid and newsworthy point.
Plus, technically, it has nothing to do with the number of transistors, and everything to do with transistor feature-size, which determines the range of nominal voltages (and just so happens to correspond pretty well in terms of order-of-magnitude of transistor counts as well).
Another destructive gem:
"Newer laptops use lithium ion batteries that have no memory, says Isidor Buchmann, the founder of Cadex, a Canadian manufacturer of battery chargers and analyzers. They don't need to be discharged to maintain their life, he says. Lithium ion batteries prefer a partial rather than a full discharge. Nonetheless, every 30 charges or so, you should run them down to zero. This measure isn't to preserve the battery but to recalibrate the fuel gauge--the indicator on the laptop screen that shows how much battery juice and time remain."
Hmm. Everything that I've read, indicates that modern batteries, really hate to be run all the way down to zero, and that can in fact damage them. That seems like a major unnecessary risk, just to calibrate a software feature that may or may not have accuracy issues. In fact, many modern batteries have their own tiny microprocessor that keeps a much more accurate battery charge history/rate.
And this one too:
"We've advised using antistatic wrist straps, but some technicians say they're unnecessary. "I've never worn a strap, our shop's floor is carpeted, and I've never shocked out a machine," says Jake Strouckel, a computer repair tech. "I've even grabbed hard drives and gotten a shock, but nothing happened to the drive." Hold cards by their edges, instead of touching the gold-plated circuits, he says, and you'll be fine."
Uhm... FLIPPING MORONS!
If there is a noticable static discharge, that's BAD. Coomputer components can be damaged by shocks of much lower magnitude than will cause noticable sparks. Remind me never to visit that repair shop, ever. (Well, maybe just to watch them work on a worthless machine, and laugh at them. hehe.)
Again, dangerous advice:
"To be safe, wear a strap, or before you tinker inside a PC, ground yourself by touching the PC's frame with the cord plugged into a grounded outlet or by touching something metal that's grounded, such as a plumbing fixture."
They forgot to mention, UNPLUG the cord, before actually working on the machine. The risk of electrical shock from the AC is very slightly, but technically possible, should something prove defective in the PSU. The real danger is (and I've even done this myself, a few times, forgetfully), is that modern ATX systems supply standby power to the PCI cards, USB ports, and RAM, as long as the cord is plugged in. Changing components while standby power is active can fry them. (Thankfully it didn't happen in the couple of cases that I forgot, but the potential is there.)