PBS running "Waging a Living" 30 million working poor, 25% of all children in U.S. now in poverty

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I seriously doubt that you are one of those fools who is buying into the Bush Bullsh!t about Iraq= Nazi Germany. There are too many differences between the two to even try to qualify that premise which any idiot should be able to decipher and since you aren't an idiot I think you are just being contrary.

Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Iraq should have been taken down 13 years ago the first time he booted the inspectors.

Nazi Germany was a very important lesson in why we MUST always enforce disarmament resolutions and treaties.

Not only because letting a dangerous tyrant stand is a bad idea, but because failure to enforce these things emboldens every other would be tyrant in the world.

So you replace one dangerous tyrant with a thousand smaller but equaly dangerous religious zealots? And as far as him being a danger to us, well we had him effectively nuetered with the no fly zones and occasional missle strikes every time one of his weapon programs became too advanced, that's why there was no WMD's to be found even after we were mislead as a whole into supporting that tragic invasion and woefully misguided occupation. In addition his Army was a joke as we demonstrated in 1991 and it was not even close to what it was back then when we invaded Iraq in the Dub's Excellent Adventure which has only accomplished making that region even more unstable than it was prior to the Dub and his Handlers fsck up.[/quote]

Had we invaded Germany in 1936 like we should have, we would have been in much the same situation we are in in Iraq today. And people like you would be going on and on about what an awful idea it was and making up piss poor attempts at comical buzz words to describe it, and our government.[/quote]Piss poor but extremely accurate,

Please explain to us the similarities between Iraq and Nazi Germany and how if not invaded Iraq would have come close to world domination like Nazi Germany did. Also explain to us how enforcing a no fly zone and preventing Iraq from effectively building up it's armed forces and weapons programs is similar to the way we handled Nazi Germany.

 

[Amused]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I seriously doubt that you are one of those fools who is buying into the Bush Bullsh!t about Iraq= Nazi Germany. There are too many differences between the two to even try to qualify that premise which any idiot should be able to decipher and since you aren't an idiot I think you are just being contrary.

Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Iraq should have been taken down 13 years ago the first time he booted the inspectors.

Nazi Germany was a very important lesson in why we MUST always enforce disarmament resolutions and treaties.

Not only because letting a dangerous tyrant stand is a bad idea, but because failure to enforce these things emboldens every other would be tyrant in the world.

So you replace one dangerous tyrant with a thousand smaller but equaly dangerous religious zealots? And as far as him being a danger to us, well we had him effectively nuetered with the no fly zones and occasional missle strikes every time one of his weapon programs became too advanced, that's why there was no WMD's to be found even after we were mislead as a whole into supporting that tragic invasion and woefully misguided occupation. In addition his Army was a joke as we demonstrated in 1991 and it was not even close to what it was back then when we invaded Iraq in the Dub's Excellent Adventure which has only accomplished making that region even more unstable than it was prior to the Dub and his Handlers fsck up.

Had we invaded Germany in 1936 like we should have, we would have been in much the same situation we are in in Iraq today. And people like you would be going on and on about what an awful idea it was and making up piss poor attempts at comical buzz words to describe it, and our government.[/quote]Piss poor but extremely accurate,

Please explain to us the similarities between Iraq and Nazi Germany and how if not invaded Iraq would have come close to world domination like Nazi Germany did. Also explain to us how enforcing a no fly zone and preventing Iraq from effectively building up it's armed forces and weapons programs is similar to the way we handled Nazi Germany.[/quote]

A no fly zone does nothing to prevent them from rearming. The embargo was a joke, as we quickly found out after we inavded. The only thing that prevented Iraq from becoming even more dangerous than it was, was Saddam's own greed and stupidity.

And, yet again, every single intelligence agency in the world, even France and Russia, assumed Saddam had WMDs. Clinton AND Gore believed the very same thing. That alone trumps any other argument about us being "misled" or lied to by the administration. And that alone was reason enough to enforce the cease fire agreement that should have been enforced 13 years ago. It's plainly obvious that they either had WMDs or did everything they could to make it appear as though they did.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I seriously doubt that you are one of those fools who is buying into the Bush Bullsh!t about Iraq= Nazi Germany. There are too many differences between the two to even try to qualify that premise which any idiot should be able to decipher and since you aren't an idiot I think you are just being contrary.

Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Iraq should have been taken down 13 years ago the first time he booted the inspectors.

Nazi Germany was a very important lesson in why we MUST always enforce disarmament resolutions and treaties.

Not only because letting a dangerous tyrant stand is a bad idea, but because failure to enforce these things emboldens every other would be tyrant in the world.

So you replace one dangerous tyrant with a thousand smaller but equaly dangerous religious zealots? And as far as him being a danger to us, well we had him effectively nuetered with the no fly zones and occasional missle strikes every time one of his weapon programs became too advanced, that's why there was no WMD's to be found even after we were mislead as a whole into supporting that tragic invasion and woefully misguided occupation. In addition his Army was a joke as we demonstrated in 1991 and it was not even close to what it was back then when we invaded Iraq in the Dub's Excellent Adventure which has only accomplished making that region even more unstable than it was prior to the Dub and his Handlers fsck up.

Had we invaded Germany in 1936 like we should have, we would have been in much the same situation we are in in Iraq today. And people like you would be going on and on about what an awful idea it was and making up piss poor attempts at comical buzz words to describe it, and our government.

Piss poor but extremely accurate,

Please explain to us the similarities between Iraq and Nazi Germany and how if not invaded Iraq would have come close to world domination like Nazi Germany did. Also explain to us how enforcing a no fly zone and preventing Iraq from effectively building up it's armed forces and weapons programs is similar to the way we handled Nazi Germany.[/quote]

A no fly zone does nothing to prevent them from rearming. The embargo was a joke, as we quickly found out after we inavded. The only thing that prevented Iraq from becoming even more dangerous than it was, was Saddam's own greed and stupidity.

And, yet again, every single intelligence agency in the world, even France and Russia, assumed Saddam had WMDs. Clinton AND Gore believed the very same thing. That alone trumps any other argument about us being "misled" or lied to by the administration. And that alone was reason enough to enforce the cease fire agreement that should have been enforced 13 years ago. It's plainly obvious that they either had WMDs or did everything they could to make it appear as though they did.[/quote]
So that must be the reason they had to fabricate all the evidence they used to mislead up into supporting the invasion.

 

[Amused]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I seriously doubt that you are one of those fools who is buying into the Bush Bullsh!t about Iraq= Nazi Germany. There are too many differences between the two to even try to qualify that premise which any idiot should be able to decipher and since you aren't an idiot I think you are just being contrary.

Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Iraq should have been taken down 13 years ago the first time he booted the inspectors.

Nazi Germany was a very important lesson in why we MUST always enforce disarmament resolutions and treaties.

Not only because letting a dangerous tyrant stand is a bad idea, but because failure to enforce these things emboldens every other would be tyrant in the world.

So you replace one dangerous tyrant with a thousand smaller but equaly dangerous religious zealots? And as far as him being a danger to us, well we had him effectively nuetered with the no fly zones and occasional missle strikes every time one of his weapon programs became too advanced, that's why there was no WMD's to be found even after we were mislead as a whole into supporting that tragic invasion and woefully misguided occupation. In addition his Army was a joke as we demonstrated in 1991 and it was not even close to what it was back then when we invaded Iraq in the Dub's Excellent Adventure which has only accomplished making that region even more unstable than it was prior to the Dub and his Handlers fsck up.

Had we invaded Germany in 1936 like we should have, we would have been in much the same situation we are in in Iraq today. And people like you would be going on and on about what an awful idea it was and making up piss poor attempts at comical buzz words to describe it, and our government.

Piss poor but extremely accurate,

Please explain to us the similarities between Iraq and Nazi Germany and how if not invaded Iraq would have come close to world domination like Nazi Germany did. Also explain to us how enforcing a no fly zone and preventing Iraq from effectively building up it's armed forces and weapons programs is similar to the way we handled Nazi Germany.

A no fly zone does nothing to prevent them from rearming. The embargo was a joke, as we quickly found out after we inavded. The only thing that prevented Iraq from becoming even more dangerous than it was, was Saddam's own greed and stupidity.

And, yet again, every single intelligence agency in the world, even France and Russia, assumed Saddam had WMDs. Clinton AND Gore believed the very same thing. That alone trumps any other argument about us being "misled" or lied to by the administration. And that alone was reason enough to enforce the cease fire agreement that should have been enforced 13 years ago. It's plainly obvious that they either had WMDs or did everything they could to make it appear as though they did.[/quote]
So that must be the reason they had to fabricate all the evidence they used to mislead up into supporting the invasion.
[/quote]

You mean France and Russia fabricated evidence too? Wow.

 

[TheSlamma]

Originally posted by: EXman
Well at least the illegals that work for me (I can't prove they are illegal) work and not just sit around collecting checks for channel surfing.

Great, so they get paid under the table by middle-upper class republican business owners so they pay no income taxes. Thats a real help.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I seriously doubt that you are one of those fools who is buying into the Bush Bullsh!t about Iraq= Nazi Germany. There are too many differences between the two to even try to qualify that premise which any idiot should be able to decipher and since you aren't an idiot I think you are just being contrary.

Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Iraq should have been taken down 13 years ago the first time he booted the inspectors.

Nazi Germany was a very important lesson in why we MUST always enforce disarmament resolutions and treaties.

Not only because letting a dangerous tyrant stand is a bad idea, but because failure to enforce these things emboldens every other would be tyrant in the world.

So you replace one dangerous tyrant with a thousand smaller but equaly dangerous religious zealots? And as far as him being a danger to us, well we had him effectively nuetered with the no fly zones and occasional missle strikes every time one of his weapon programs became too advanced, that's why there was no WMD's to be found even after we were mislead as a whole into supporting that tragic invasion and woefully misguided occupation. In addition his Army was a joke as we demonstrated in 1991 and it was not even close to what it was back then when we invaded Iraq in the Dub's Excellent Adventure which has only accomplished making that region even more unstable than it was prior to the Dub and his Handlers fsck up.

Had we invaded Germany in 1936 like we should have, we would have been in much the same situation we are in in Iraq today. And people like you would be going on and on about what an awful idea it was and making up piss poor attempts at comical buzz words to describe it, and our government.

Piss poor but extremely accurate,

Please explain to us the similarities between Iraq and Nazi Germany and how if not invaded Iraq would have come close to world domination like Nazi Germany did. Also explain to us how enforcing a no fly zone and preventing Iraq from effectively building up it's armed forces and weapons programs is similar to the way we handled Nazi Germany.

A no fly zone does nothing to prevent them from rearming. The embargo was a joke, as we quickly found out after we inavded. The only thing that prevented Iraq from becoming even more dangerous than it was, was Saddam's own greed and stupidity.

And, yet again, every single intelligence agency in the world, even France and Russia, assumed Saddam had WMDs. Clinton AND Gore believed the very same thing. That alone trumps any other argument about us being "misled" or lied to by the administration. And that alone was reason enough to enforce the cease fire agreement that should have been enforced 13 years ago. It's plainly obvious that they either had WMDs or did everything they could to make it appear as though they did.

So that must be the reason they had to fabricate all the evidence they used to mislead up into supporting the invasion.
[/quote]

You mean France and Russia fabricated evidence too? Wow.[/quote] I wouldn't put it past either of them to get us in the predicament that we are in now as neither has our best interest at heart.

If you want to see fabricated evidence just look to Colin Powels presentation to the UN regarding our argument for invading Iraq. Even Colin Powel now acknowledges that it was BS abd that he was forced to present it even though he and his staff had strong doubts about it's accuracy.


Wrong Forum