• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Paul McCartney gets dump by wife

Baked

Lifer
CNN

Paul's worth 1.5 Billion. And w/o a prenuptial, looks like the blond model will get up to 750 million. LOL @ Paul. gg buddy, gg. Conned by yet another airhead.


Divorce could cost McCartney $380M

LONDON, England (Reuters) -- Former Beatle Paul McCartney could lose up to a quarter of his estimated $1,555 million (£825 million) fortune after separating from his second wife Heather Mills, legal experts have said.

That would equate to roughly £1 million for every week of their four-year marriage.

McCartney, 63, and former model Mills, 38, announced their separation on Wednesday, blaming media intrusion for the collapse of one of the most high-profile showbusiness marriages. (Watch the good and bad times in Beatle marriage -- 2:00)

Lawyers believe the divorce would never be allowed to degenerate into a messy court case but they said McCartney's decision not to seal a pre-nuptial deal could cost him dear in a private settlement.

The couple, who have a two-year-old daughter, Beatrice, met in 1999 at a charity event, a year after the death from breast cancer of McCartney's first wife Linda Eastman.

Lawyer Mark Stephens of Finers, Stephens and Innocent told Reuters on Thursday: "Heather and the child need to be looked after financially. I think you are looking at £150 million to £200 million."

"She is the child of a Beatle and they have to live in a cosseted and protected environment," he said, recalling the killing of John Lennon by a crazed fan and the attempt on the life of George Harrison.

Independent legal estimates on how much Heather could get are based on a recent high-profile divorce dispute between fund manager Alan Miller and his wife Melissa.

She was awarded £5 million of his £20 million fortune after a childless marriage that lasted less than three years. The House of Lords, Britain's highest court, is to make a final ruling on the case next week.

After their separation was announced, McCartney denied that Heather had ever been attracted to his fortune, estimated by the Sunday Times Rich List at £825 million ($1.56 billion). (Full story)

"It's been suggested that she married me for the money," he said. "There is not an ounce of truth in this."

In an interview before her marriage, Mills said she had offered to sign a pre-nuptial agreement but McCartney had turned down the offer.

"The acid test is now," said Stephen Foster, head of the divorce department at Stewarts. "I think it would be a big award. I wouldn't be shocked if it is £100 million."

"He famously didn't sign a pre-nup as he said it was unromantic. If they don't resolve things amicably and it becomes a protracted court case, that could be a very expensive decision," he said.

"If Paul and Heather had any sense -- and I am sure they do --- they would both seek top quality independent advice from lawyers and accountants and settle this round a table. Is it in anyone's interest to be front page news for a year?"
 
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Losing $750m when you are worth $1.5b isn't really going to hurt anyone.

I don't care how much money you have...losing half of it in a divorce hurts.
 
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: kogase
Originally posted by: Forsythe
I'm not sure he'll lose that much. It's not in the US afaik.

Yeah, if he's in Britian she'll get everything.

Should i be laughing?

No. What I said may have been an exageration, but Britain favors the woman even more than the US does.
 
Originally posted by: Forsythe
I'm not sure he'll lose that much. It's not in the US afaik.

A 50/50 split is often imposed over there as well, IIRC.

I'd certainly be a little pissed to lose three quarters of a billion dollars that she had no hand in making.
 
Originally posted by: toekramp
i read she could get as MUCH as $380, not nearly half

ha, anna nicole smith had to shag an 80 something year old guy and she got nothing! (as of yet).
 
Originally posted by: kogase
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: kogase
Originally posted by: Forsythe
I'm not sure he'll lose that much. It's not in the US afaik.

Yeah, if he's in Britian she'll get everything.

Should i be laughing?

No. What I said may have been an exageration, but Britain favors the woman even more than the US does.


probably true, the commies are strong in england

i say he deserves to lose half. he's worth 1.5 billion and doesn't have a prenup? dumbass..
and its not like we're crying any tears over it... its 1.5 billion😛

well u know how they say women only earn 75 cents on the dollar compared to men eh. i guess they never take this into consideration. they just inheret the rest in divorce or when their hubby dies lol
 
Originally posted by: Baked
Paul's worth 1.5 Billion. And w/o a prenuptial, looks like the blond model will get up to 750 million. LOL @ Paul. gg buddy, gg. Conned by yet another airhead.

wtf?! 1.5B and no prenup?!

Why didnt he do a prenup?
 
This is what happens when a man old enough to be the lady's father marries her. There's a child involved too so no easy way out.
 
Originally posted by: kogase
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: kogase
Originally posted by: Forsythe
I'm not sure he'll lose that much. It's not in the US afaik.

Yeah, if he's in Britian she'll get everything.

Should i be laughing?

No. What I said may have been an exageration, but Britain favors the woman even more than the US does.

Cool, i didn't know that.

Still stupid. I wouldn't give her a cent she hasn't worked for herself.
 
CNN

Divorce could cost McCartney $380M

LONDON, England (Reuters) -- Former Beatle Paul McCartney could lose up to a quarter of his estimated $1,555 million (£825 million) fortune after separating from his second wife Heather Mills, legal experts have said.

That would equate to roughly £1 million for every week of their four-year marriage.

McCartney, 63, and former model Mills, 38, announced their separation on Wednesday, blaming media intrusion for the collapse of one of the most high-profile showbusiness marriages. (Watch the good and bad times in Beatle marriage -- 2:00)

Lawyers believe the divorce would never be allowed to degenerate into a messy court case but they said McCartney's decision not to seal a pre-nuptial deal could cost him dear in a private settlement.

The couple, who have a two-year-old daughter, Beatrice, met in 1999 at a charity event, a year after the death from breast cancer of McCartney's first wife Linda Eastman.

Lawyer Mark Stephens of Finers, Stephens and Innocent told Reuters on Thursday: "Heather and the child need to be looked after financially. I think you are looking at £150 million to £200 million."

"She is the child of a Beatle and they have to live in a cosseted and protected environment," he said, recalling the killing of John Lennon by a crazed fan and the attempt on the life of George Harrison.

Independent legal estimates on how much Heather could get are based on a recent high-profile divorce dispute between fund manager Alan Miller and his wife Melissa.

She was awarded £5 million of his £20 million fortune after a childless marriage that lasted less than three years. The House of Lords, Britain's highest court, is to make a final ruling on the case next week.

After their separation was announced, McCartney denied that Heather had ever been attracted to his fortune, estimated by the Sunday Times Rich List at £825 million ($1.56 billion). (Full story)

"It's been suggested that she married me for the money," he said. "There is not an ounce of truth in this."

In an interview before her marriage, Mills said she had offered to sign a pre-nuptial agreement but McCartney had turned down the offer.

"The acid test is now," said Stephen Foster, head of the divorce department at Stewarts. "I think it would be a big award. I wouldn't be shocked if it is £100 million."

"He famously didn't sign a pre-nup as he said it was unromantic. If they don't resolve things amicably and it becomes a protracted court case, that could be a very expensive decision," he said.

"If Paul and Heather had any sense -- and I am sure they do --- they would both seek top quality independent advice from lawyers and accountants and settle this round a table. Is it in anyone's interest to be front page news for a year?"

 
Back
Top