silverpig
Lifer
- Jul 29, 2001
- 27,703
- 12
- 81
Originally posted by: alchemize
I think that's a plausible explanation, are there other modern examples?Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Originally posted by: alchemize
LOL I just knew something stunk on this one.
Partisans, feel free to correct me, but this is all based on his work about oh 15-20 years ago?
He hasn't been an economist for years and is nothing more than a political commentator now.
That's not at all uncommon in the world of Nobel prizes. Theories are confirmed, ideas become mainstream over time. Sometimes it's difficult to recognise someone's genius without the benefit of hindsight.
Uh, virtually every recent Nobel in physics is given decades after the work was performed. The work done for the 2008 prize was started in the '60s.