:beer:Originally posted by: Ranger X
They're stupid for not appealing before the medal ceremony. Stupidity should not be forgiven and I am happy that Hamm got to keep his medal.
Originally posted by: jjones
:beer:Originally posted by: Ranger X
They're stupid for not appealing before the medal ceremony. Stupidity should not be forgiven and I am happy that Hamm got to keep his medal.
Originally posted by: DanTMWTMP
i bet if it was the other way around, you guys will be the one who's still fvcking complaining.
does it always have to be country vs country?
fvcking white americans
Originally posted by: DanTMWTMP
i bet if it was the other way around, you guys will be the one who's still fvcking complaining.
does it always have to be country vs country?
fvcking white americans
Originally posted by: Ranger X
They're stupid for not appealing before the medal ceremony. Stupidity should not be forgiven and I am happy that Hamm got to keep his medal.
Originally posted by: notfred
It's all bullcrap anyway. The final top three scores were:
57.823
57.811
57.774
The difference between 1st and third was less than ONE TENTH OF ONE PERCENT. Now, If these were times in a race, I'd agree that it was clear who won, but this judging is entirely subjective. Can you really say that the judges have the eye to distinguish performances that differ by less than one tenth of a percent accurately?
This is analogous to a cop pulling you over and saying "You were going 65.07mph in a 65 zone" based totally on his estimation of your speed.