Patrick Fitzgerald For President

conehead433

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 2002
5,569
901
126
OK call me crazy, but Patrick Fitzgerald should be the next President. Incorruptible, no party affilliations. Too perfect.
 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,059
73
91
Originally posted by: conehead433
OK call me crazy, but Patrick Fitzgerald should be the next President. Incorruptible, no party affilliations. Too perfect.
OK. You're crazy. Just taking you up on your request. ;)

We now return you to your topic, and I think I'd rather see Fitzgerald on the Supreme Court. We need someone with that much integrity and ability to communicate his reasoning to go with his obvious intellect.

The man's a winner all the way. :thumbsup:
 

fjord

Senior member
Feb 18, 2004
667
0
0
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: conehead433
OK call me crazy, but Patrick Fitzgerald should be the next President. Incorruptible, no party affilliations. Too perfect.
OK. You're crazy. Just taking you up on your request. ;)

We now return you to your topic, and I think I'd rather see Fitzgerald on the Supreme Court. We need someone with that much integrity and ability to communicate his reasoning to go with his obvious intellect.

The man's a winner all the way. :thumbsup:

Fema dude also available for the Supreme Court. I have no doubt Bush would do it in a second.;)
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Fiengold would be better. Someone with a track record or always doing what's right IMO.

Patriot Act? 99-1 with Feingold dissent.

Voted to confim everyone of Bush's court justices, beleiving is his power as president long as qualifed.

Voted to bear arms each time.

Votes sensible on social issues and wants balanced budget amendment.
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: Zebo
Fiengold would be better. Someone with a track record or always doing what's right IMO.

Patriot Act? 99-1 with Feingold dissent.

Voted to confim everyone of Bush's court justices, beleiving is his power as president long as qualifed.

Voted to bear arms each time.

Votes sensible on social issues and wants balanced budget amendment.

Hasn't Feingold's name been floated around in a relatively serious manner for the job?
 

PsharkJF

Senior member
Jul 12, 2004
653
0
0
Originally posted by: conehead433
OK call me crazy, but Patrick Fitzgerald should be the next President. Incorruptible, no party affilliations. Too perfect.

Why not supreme court? :D
 

zendari

Banned
May 27, 2005
6,558
0
0
Originally posted by: PsharkJF
Originally posted by: conehead433
OK call me crazy, but Patrick Fitzgerald should be the next President. Incorruptible, no party affilliations. Too perfect.

Why not supreme court? :D

Hillary would never nominate someone who isn't a flaming liberal.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
You really think hillary is gunna be president?? Not unless they really have those black voting boxes rigged.
 

EatSpam

Diamond Member
May 1, 2005
6,423
0
0
Originally posted by: Zebo
You really think hillary is gunna be president?? Not unless they really have those black voting boxes rigged.

It all depends on who the Republicans run... Hillary will win against Jebby... maybe not against McCain.
 

arsbanned

Banned
Dec 12, 2003
4,853
0
0
Originally posted by: conehead433
OK call me crazy, but Patrick Fitzgerald should be the next President. Incorruptible, no party affilliations. Too perfect.

Too honest, too normal. Americans are too stupid to elect someone that's actually competent who might begin to dig us out of the incredible mess we're in.
Better brush up on your Chinese. Or make peace with your maker. One of the two. :p
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Fitzgerald for President, Starr for Vice-President. Sounds like 2008 ticket to me :thumbsup:
 

joshw10

Senior member
Feb 16, 2004
806
0
0
Top 10 Things Republicans Have To Say About Patrick Fitzgerald (Coming Soon to a TV Near You)

10. He graduated from Amherst and Harvard as a northern elitist liberal
9. His investigation is supported by radical-left billionaire George Soros
8. Democrats voted to confirm Fitzgerald in the Senate
7. Demoralizes the troops
6. Aides the enemy terrorists
5. Flip-flopped from Karl Rove to Scooter Libby
4. Legislates from in front of the bench
3. Doesn't wear an American flag lapel pin
2. Investigated freedom in an attempt to destroy it
1. Hates freedom
 

laFiera

Senior member
May 12, 2001
862
0
0
for those who don't have time to do research, or for those that just simply don't like to do research--like me!! :) here is an interesting article.....i would research him some more before i start nominating him for presidency..............oh yea, just for the hell of it..didn't bush say he was going to bring integrity back to washington?
After examining Fitzgerald's role in the GRF & BIF cases, I am even more convinced that this Valerie Plame case will not reach the "Bush-Cheney" level. Just look at the outcome of the BIF & GRF cases. As soon as the investigations reached those close to higherups in Washington, the prosecutors seemed to spend more time on a coverup, than on pursuing a bona fide investigation.
 

BaliBabyDoc

Lifer
Jan 20, 2001
10,737
0
0
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: PsharkJF
Originally posted by: conehead433
OK call me crazy, but Patrick Fitzgerald should be the next President. Incorruptible, no party affilliations. Too perfect.

Why not supreme court? :D

Hillary would never nominate someone who isn't a flaming liberal.

Hopefully flaming liberals will meet the same fate as flaming conservatives . . . never nominated again . . . and if nominated . . . voted down . . . followed by ridicule of the tool that nominated them in the first place.
 

imported_yetti

Senior member
Sep 17, 2004
746
0
0
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: PsharkJF
Originally posted by: conehead433
OK call me crazy, but Patrick Fitzgerald should be the next President. Incorruptible, no party affilliations. Too perfect.

Why not supreme court? :D

Hillary would never nominate someone who isn't a flaming liberal.

Hopefully flaming liberals will meet the same fate as flaming conservatives . . . never nominated again . . . and if nominated . . . voted down . . . followed by ridicule of the tool that nominated them in the first place.


that's sig material right there. :thumbsup:
 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,059
73
91
Originally posted by: laFiera
oh yea, just for the hell of it..didn't bush say he was going to bring integrity back to washington?
He's quitting? :laugh:
 

Cooler

Diamond Member
Mar 31, 2005
3,835
0
0
Heck If He ran I would Vote for him same for McCain. Why does america Have to be Far right or far left let us have someone in the middle with a head on there shoulders for once.