Patrick administration refuses to release Tsarnaev brothers' records

[HomerJS]

Don't expect idiots like obama to call them Jihadists he refuses to do that because he is so PC.

The American taxpayer was forced to pay for jihad and a terrorist attack. Are the idiots who support welfare going to be held accountable for this? NO

Joe Biden already referred to them as Jihadists. Next chapter in your feigned outrage.

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/world/bombers-knockoff-jihadists-biden-20130425-2ihcy.html

 

[Incorruptible]

Joe Biden already referred to them as Jihadists. Next chapter in your feigned outrage.

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/world/bombers-knockoff-jihadists-biden-20130425-2ihcy.html

Once again you display your stupidity. And when will obama do it?

 

[JEDIYoda]

It isn't about privacy. It is about politicians attempting to keep the information that the Boston Bombers used government welfare to finance their jihad away from the public.

another bat shit crazy poster,,,,so let me guess....
If it proved that all the money they received was in the form of government hand outs...then you would surmise that the government was responsible for the Boston marathon bombings...because it was money from the government......that is sad and pathetic thinking...

 

[fskimospy]

Joe Biden already referred to them as Jihadists. Next chapter in your feigned outrage.

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/world/bombers-knockoff-jihadists-biden-20130425-2ihcy.html

It's funny to watch these guys continue to move the goal posts. First Obama needs to call things terrorism. When he calls things terrorism now he needs to call people jihadists. I'm sure once he calls them jihadists they will invent some other thing to be outraged about.

These idiots don't care what language Obama uses, they just want a reason to hate on him.

 

[Incorruptible]

It's funny to watch these guys continue to move the goal posts. First Obama needs to call things terrorism. When he calls things terrorism now he needs to call people jihadists. I'm sure once he calls them jihadists they will invent some other thing to be outraged about.

These idiots don't care what language Obama uses, they just want a reason to hate on him.

The only idiot is you. obama can't even say that they are jihadists and radical Islamists. The piece of shit called the Ft Hood Massacre "workplace violence".

 

[fskimospy]

The only idiot is you. obama can't even say that they are jihadists and radical Islamists. The piece of shit called the Ft Hood Massacre "workplace violence".

Say that Obama used only language that was personally approved by you. What would that change?

You just want a reason to rage and foam impotently.

 

[Incorruptible]

Say that Obama used only language that was personally approved by you. What would that change?

You just want a reason to rage and foam impotently.

Not just me. The terrorists were jihadists and radical islamists. It's pathetic how far people will go to defend him.

 

[fskimospy]

Not just me. The terrorists were jihadists and radical islamists. It's pathetic how far people will go to defend him.

Haha, you realize that your response says that you believe there are additional people who also wish to rage and foam impotently, right?

 

[Balt]

It isn't about privacy. It is about politicians attempting to keep the information that the Boston Bombers used government welfare to finance their jihad away from the public.

Except we already know that. How exactly do the specifics matter? Are you going to match up their pressure cooker receipt dates with the dates they received their welfare?

What percentage of public assistance that is distributed domestically do you think is used to fund terrorism?

 

[her209]

I am not the one who had to resort to bringing in the soldiers.

You resorted to your usual deflection and dumassery. Nothing wrong with bringing in soldiers as they are large benefactors of tax payer money.

 

[Incorruptible]

You resorted to your usual deflection and dumassery. Nothing wrong with bringing in soldiers as they are large benefactors of tax payer money.

So you are alright with attacking soldiers but not welfare recipients?

 

[her209]

So you are alright with attacking soldiers but not welfare recipients?

Lololololol. Are you really this dense in real life too? Don't answer that. Its rhetorical.

Again, you're pathetic.

Government benefits are not private. As long as the taxpayer pays for them then they have a right to see it. Those fucking pieces of shit who blocked the records must be fired for this. Do they support the terrorists?