Hi, this question may seems old, but i am confused...
having a PATA drive:
Western Digital Caviar WD800JB (80.0GB ATA-100)
and SATA drive:
Seagate Barracua ATA V SATA Review (120 GB SATA)
people say SATA drive is faster bescause it is serial link up not parallel link up
but in www.storagereview.com
the ata drive beat sata drive in almost every column, can someone please tell me what is going on?
because building a new pc, people will use sata drive. and if building a new pc, why use slower part
having a PATA drive:
Western Digital Caviar WD800JB (80.0GB ATA-100)
and SATA drive:
Seagate Barracua ATA V SATA Review (120 GB SATA)
people say SATA drive is faster bescause it is serial link up not parallel link up
but in www.storagereview.com
the ata drive beat sata drive in almost every column, can someone please tell me what is going on?
because building a new pc, people will use sata drive. and if building a new pc, why use slower part