Passive cooling video card

mdrollas

Senior member
Apr 9, 2004
442
0
0
Hi, I am looking for a budget passive cooling video card to build a quiet system. Planning to spend around 50-55 dollars. This system is for my parents and they won't do any gaming. Maybe watch some DVD, MPG that's it. Basically 2D stuff.

Is 9200SE (around 48-52) good enough or should I get 9600se (around 66-75)?

Any suggestions?

thanks
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
Since they wont be gaming, why not go for an even cheaper card?

I am sure you can find a lot of cheaper videocards for $25-30 like Radeon 7000 or Geforce 4 Mx420

just look on www.pricewatch.com

9200SE sounds alright you can pick it up for $40 with shipping too.

Why spend more money on a 9600se when they wont be gaming at all?

Also I was under the impression DVDs and MPEG format movies are more dependent on how fast your CPU is rather than GPU because they only run at 24 frames anyway.
 

Tostada

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,789
0
0
If they're not doing any gaming, and if they're not going to set their desktop above 1024x768, then you'd be better off with nForce 2 integrated graphics:

This is a great NForce 2 dual-channel board with integrated graphics for $61:
http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=13-138-234

There is rarely any justification for getting a 64-bit graphics card anymore, because the nForce 2 integrated graphics are just as good as a Radeon 9200:

Tom's integrated graphics review

If you're going to use 1600x1200 resolution, I've heard people complain about the 2D quality of integrated graphics, but that's usually not an issue with non-gamers.

Although yeah, there's nothing wrong with the 9200SE. It has the DVI out, so it's the way to go for non-gamers with an LCD. The 9600 (not the 9600 SE) is a good 128-bit passive card for $94 if there's any chance of you wanting to play a modern game on their system.
 

Cheetah8799

Diamond Member
Apr 12, 2001
4,508
0
76
Good point Tostada. Integrated graphics on the mobo will save a good chunk of money in the end if you haven't already purchased the motherboard. Some folks with nForce2 motherboards have issues with onboard video when they don't have dual-channel ram. I know I've had issues, artifacts, little static glitch thingies, etc.. So be sure to get 2 sticks of ram to run in dual-channel instead of just one.
 

mdrollas

Senior member
Apr 9, 2004
442
0
0
Is nForce 2 that good? I have had bad experience with onboard video (ProSavage) and it was really really really slow.

Thanks for the info by the way :)
 

JustAnAverageGuy

Diamond Member
Aug 1, 2003
9,057
0
76
mdrollas:

To even compare the two would be like comparing how hot your fingers are compared to an oven set at 300°. Nowhere near the same.
 

Tostada

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,789
0
0
Just look at the integrated graphics review on Tom's that I linked. The nForce 2 is pretty decent ... 88.5 FPS in Quake 1024x768 32-bit and 37.0 FPS in UT2K3 is pretty good. If you use 16-bit color, you can play modern games just fine.
 

Ionizer86

Diamond Member
Jun 20, 2001
5,292
0
76
Just remember, getting two sticks of ram just for integrated graphics may not be worth it, especially since NF2 IGP's cost a bit more than NF2 SPP systems. It may be cheaper getting a discrete card anyway, in which case I'd spend $6 over $48 to get a 9200 non-SE.