Passenger Accused Of Slapping Air Marshal after refusing to get off cell phone

Analog

Lifer
Jan 7, 2002
12,755
3
0
Passenger Accused Of Slapping Air Marshal
Woman Allegedly Refused To Get Off Cell Phone


A US Airways passenger slapped a federal air marshal after refusing to sit down and repeatedly ignoring orders to get off her cell phone, which she said would be "rude," federal prosecutors charged Tuesday.

A public defender was appointed to represent Lilia Belkova, who will remain in jail pending a bail hearing Thursday.

Belkova was charged with assaulting a federal officer and interfering with a flight crew after her Miami-Philadelphia flight returned to the gate last Wednesday to drop her off.

The trouble started when she refused orders to turn off her phone while Flight 26 was taxiing for takeoff, saying: "It is rude to hang up on people. I don't have to turn my phone off."

A flight attendant told her that she would need to change her seat if she couldn't follow instructions because she was sitting in an emergency exit row, which was open only to people who follow directions. She was sitting 11 rows ahead of her assigned seat.

Belkova, 38, responded that she was disabled and needed a wheelchair to reach the jet. The flight attendant said that was another reason for her to move because only people who could open the exit door were allowed to sit there.

Belkova said she could lift the 40-pound door and reached for the handle before other passengers yelled at her to stop.

The plane's first officer was notified and decided Belkova needed to get off the plane. Heading back to the gate, she stood up, walked forward and was told to sit down.

One of two air marshals on the flight told Belkova she was interfering with the crew, told her to be seated and put a hand on her shoulder to show her where to sit.

Belkova reached back and slapped the marshal across the face, causing "minor swelling," according to court papers filed by another marshal. Belkova was handcuffed and taken off the plane.
 

Sukhoi

Elite Member
Dec 5, 1999
15,350
106
106
No, more like atleast 94% of the time.

This woman better get some jail time or a big fine for delaying that many people.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
jesus christ lock that b!tch up!

Let me recap
1) she wasnt sitting in her assigned seat
2) she wouln't turn her phone off as you are required to by FAA while the plane was taxing to the runway to take off
3) she lied about being disabled and attempted to open the emergency exit door
4) she slapped a federal marshal as she was lead to her new seat

f*ck it send her ass to cuba with all the other terrorists
 

slick230

Banned
Jan 31, 2003
2,776
0
0
They should have stuffed her in the landing gear compartment for her chilly trip. Bitch.
 

Raiden256

Platinum Member
Feb 11, 2001
2,144
0
0
Originally posted by: yellowfiero
Belkova said she could lift the 40-pound door and reached for the handle before other passengers yelled at her to stop.

See, right there you know she's a little off....
 

upsciLLion

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2001
5,947
1
81
Cell phones generate EMI which could potentially interrupt the normal functioning of the aircraft's electronics. Having people not use them on flights is more than a courtesy issue.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Cell phones generate EMI which could potentially interrupt the normal functioning of the aircraft's electronics. Having people not use them on flights is more than a courtesy issue.

last time i check its an FAA regulation
 

sharkeeper

Lifer
Jan 13, 2001
10,886
2
0
A flight attendant told her that she would need to change her seat if she couldn't follow instructions because she was sitting in an emergency exit row, which was open only to people who follow directions.

:D :D :D

What a high maintenance bitch. They should have thrown her off the jetway, Lloyd Christmas style! If I were the air marshall, I would have snapped the cell phone from her grip, removed the battery and thrown it in the microwave. :|

Cheers!
 

TheBDB

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2002
3,176
0
0
Originally posted by: Howard
If I were the marshal, I would kick her ass under the guise of self-defense.

I know....they carry guns for a reason.
 

phonemonkey

Senior member
Feb 2, 2003
806
0
0
Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Cell phones generate EMI which could potentially interrupt the normal functioning of the aircraft's electronics. Having people not use them on flights is more than a courtesy issue.

I thought it was the cell phones broadcasting at max power that can interfere with the instruments themselves. This is why you can use it on the ground with no problems. I've done something like this before when driving and it drained by battery pretty quickly (maybe 3 hours of standby time before the phone died).

Newer phones that have an "airplane mode" don't have to be turned off, as enabling it effectively stops it from searching for cell towers.
 

BurnItDwn

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
26,353
1,862
126
"Belkova said she could lift the 40-pound door and reached for the handle before other passengers yelled at her to stop. "


well, some day She will be eligible for a Darwin award ... I just hope she doesn't take anyone with her
 

Gunbuster

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
6,852
23
81
They would not let you take it onboard if it could do real harm to the planes systems. I bet every takeoff and landing has 5+ fully powered phones and PDA's with wireless.
 

goblue420

Senior member
Aug 29, 2003
478
0
0
I gotta airplane mode on mine :) turns the radio off so u cant make / recieve calls, but u can still use the phone, aside from that kick that bia off the plane comeone its the law to have it off right...
 

EvilYoda

Lifer
Apr 1, 2001
21,198
9
81
i hope they let her sit in jail for a while...maybe the paperwork will get "lost". (And yes, it's our tax dollars...but just for a few days, it'd be worth it, seeing as how we can't send her somewhere nor shoot her)
 

bsobel

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Dec 9, 2001
13,346
0
0
Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Cell phones generate EMI which could potentially interrupt the normal functioning of the aircraft's electronics. Having people not use them on flights is more than a courtesy issue.

Actually that has never been proven. The main reason for the requirement is from the air your phone can reach many more towers than it can from 'ground level' and is moving much faster than the cell systems are designed to handle.

Bill
 

Yossarian

Lifer
Dec 26, 2000
18,010
1
81
Originally posted by: Gunbuster
They would not let you take it onboard if it could do real harm to the planes systems. I bet every takeoff and landing has 5+ fully powered phones and PDA's with wireless.

occasionally pilots will report that a laptop or other electronic device interfered with nav equipment or a radio or something.
 

RagingBITCH

Lifer
Sep 27, 2003
17,618
2
76
Originally posted by: Adul
haha i would like to hear her comment from the slammer :D

"EXCUUUUUUUSE me I am trying to pee, avert your eyes"
"Fvck you skank biyotch, youz in the slammer"
*slap*
"Oh no you just didnt!" *snap snap*
"That is rude to snap at me"
 

slick230

Banned
Jan 31, 2003
2,776
0
0
Originally posted by: bsobel
Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Cell phones generate EMI which could potentially interrupt the normal functioning of the aircraft's electronics. Having people not use them on flights is more than a courtesy issue.

Actually that has never been proven. The main reason for the requirement is from the air your phone can reach many more towers than it can from 'ground level' and is moving much faster than the cell systems are designed to handle.

Bill

So why would the FAA care if your cellphone's carrier can't keep up with your signal? :roll: