• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Party Like It's 1984

lxskllr

No Lifer
Cryptoparty! I haven't read through this book yet, but it looks like a good primer on internet security/privacy. It's always good to know the rules of the game you're playing, so check it out. It's CC-BY-SA, 24mb...

http://ubuntuone.com/4k0SmVcJiJgHb7ULqM1C50

Edit:
Crap, this was meant for OT. O/S is probably just as good anyway. Dunno... :^/
 
Last edited:
Grumpy-Cat-Tadar-Sauce.jpg
 
A Senate proposal touted as protecting Americans' e-mail privacy has been quietly rewritten, giving government agencies more surveillance power than they possess under current law, CNET has learned.

Patrick Leahy, the influential Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee, has dramatically reshaped his legislation in response to law enforcement concerns, according to three individuals who have been negotiating with Leahy's staff over the changes. A vote on his bill, which now authorizes warrantless access to Americans' e-mail, is scheduled for next week.

Leahy's rewritten bill would allow more than 22 agencies -- including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Communications Commission -- to access Americans' e-mail, Google Docs files, Facebook wall posts, and Twitter direct messages without a search warrant. It also would give the FBI and Homeland Security more authority, in some circumstances, to gain full access to Internet accounts without notifying either the owner or a judge.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-5...ithout-warrants/?part=rss&subj=news&tag=title
 
Last edited:
Back
Top