You're back with a new rigUser: zoko
CPU = Intel 12400 HT = Off (ECLK 131 -> 5.3ghz)
RAM = DRR5 6288 mhz CL26-36-30-28
GPU = RTX 4090
Corvega- Draw Calls: 7988 @ 134.5 FPS
Diamond City- Draw Calls: 12086 @ 106.7 FPS
View attachment 83162View attachment 83163
I actually went through multiple systems, 7950x3d -> 13900k (one with bad IMC) -> 12400.You're back with a new rig
Or limiting it with your new 12400 HR rig at the bottom:
Can't really knock it at $90. Although the whole platform would be more. We do have ADL/RL scores with DDR4 too, although maybe DDR5-6000 is actually cheaper than DDR4-4200+ anyhow.I actually went through multiple systems, 7950x3d -> 13900k (one with bad IMC) -> 12400.
The 12400 is staying with me, as it got a huge improvement (I can provide the stock + jedec performance) and for what it cost me, it is amazing ($90 for the cpu)
I will be getting raptor lake refresh and testing that too.
surprising not.Can't really knock it at $90. Although the whole platform would be more. We do have ADL/RL scores with DDR4 too, although maybe DDR5-6000 is actually cheaper than DDR4-4200+ anyhow.
Anyway, close to 5800x3D performance is pretty impressive.
Did a very basic comparison on a other forum right after the game launched:Honest question: has anyone given thought to converting this test to a Starfield test instead?
The Bottom picture is actually Corvega and the one above is Diamond City. By looking at the FPS on an AMD GPU does this mean that AMD GPU's i.e., 7900xtx have better optimization now than compared to when they first came out? As in the Chart Position where yukie via zoko chart position #26 7800x3d, 6400mhz RAm and 7900xtx - average fps 126. Or Nvidia is still better overall in regard to optimal performance and FPS.CPU = 7800X3D -30CO
RAM = 6200Mhz
GPU = 6800XT
View attachment 87268
Corvega- Draw Calls: 8010 @ 135.3 FPS
View attachment 87269
Diamond City- Draw Calls: 11702@ 103.9 FPS
View attachment 87270
Ok i fixed it.And he have 7800X3D with 107mhz bclk so its way faster than stock.Stock 7800X3d have max clock 5050mhz and with 107bclk its 5400mhz.The Bottom picture is actually Corvega and the one above is Diamond City. By looking at the FPS on an AMD GPU does this mean that AMD GPU's i.e., 7900xtx have better optimization now than compared to when they first came out? As in the Chart Position where yukie via zoko chart position #26 7800x3d, 6400mhz RAm and 7900xtx - average fps 126. Or Nvidia is still better overall in regard to optimal performance and FPS.
Thanks for the replyOk i fixed it.And he have 7800X3D with 107mhz bclk so its way faster than stock.Stock 7800X3d have max clock 5050mhz and with 107bclk its 5400mhz.
AMD dx11 driver still looks like crap compared to Nvdia in this game.
This would be a nice thing for someone to organise!Honest question: has anyone given thought to converting this test to a Starfield test instead?
That's a no AFAIK - not here and not in similar thread over at ocuk.Hello, has anyone did a test with the i7 14700k or i9 14900k?
The only reason I was asking because I am going to upgrade my PC but keep my 1080ti for the time being as prices for the Nvidia 4070ti and above are expensive here in Australia. The lowest 4070ti is the ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Trinity, 16GB at $1349 AUD. But someone on Discord recommended to get the 7800x3d to match my 1080ti because he has done it and currently saving up to get a 4080 super themself.That's a no AFAIK - not here and not in similar thread over at ocuk.
The Intel results show even more that memory tuning is crucial.
Top 15 ATM:
The top Intel score is on that 13600KF with DDR4 but look at the memory tuning!
Even the Zen 3D - which can get good results with almost no tuning - show that the top scorers have all tuned their memory too.
Upgraded to 4080super and everything else is same.CPU = 7800X3D -30CO
RAM = 6200Mhz
GPU = 6800XT
View attachment 87268
Diamond City- Draw Calls: 8010 @ 135.3 FPS
View attachment 87269
Corvega- Draw Calls: 11702@ 103.9 FPS
View attachment 87270
That has moved your ranking up a good bit!Upgraded to 4080super and everything else is same.
Diamond City- Draw Calls: 8032 @ 160.6 FPS
View attachment 97204
Corvega- Draw Calls: 11707@ 127 FPS
View attachment 97205
So nvidia drivers are 18.7% faster in scene1 and 22.2% faster in second scene.
I noticed that they might have done something, the issue is that I cant confirm it right now since im on a new setup that I want to upload some scores here but wont till I fix the issue.Eagerly awaiting new test results. The new patch, uh is not being well received.
Thanks!Im finally back, first of all, I found my old SSD with the benchmark ready, which is before the patch.
Those are the results that I got (Pre-Update)
User: zoko
CPU = Intel 13900ks HT = Off
Cpu Frequecies
P-Cores = 6.1Ghz
E-cores = 4.6 Ghz
Ring = 5.4 Ghz
RAM = DRR5 8000 mhz CL34-47-47-59
View attachment 104935
GPU = RTX 3090
Corvega- Draw Calls: 7886 @ 172.4 FPS
View attachment 104933
Diamond City- Draw Calls: 11622 @ 137.3 FPS
View attachment 104931
I will be trying the same settings on the newest patch + ENB version.
Edit:
I just tested the new ENB and patch, same results as above.
It certainly does!If i get bored tonight, i will maybe do a Zen5 run @ maxed out 6600/2200 1:1 (same hardware as with the 7950X3D)
Just hope i remember how to set this up, last time it required some fiddeling around 🤣