- Mar 29, 2004
- 13,051
- 6
- 81
If foxnews had been around throughout history
I happened across this site and got a big laugh, why does foxnews take such a "royalist" point of view, do you think foxnews would be on the "other" King George's side?
Enjoy and feel free to discuss, I would like to hear why foxnews would not take this side of the issues throughout history seeing their stances in modern times on related issues.
Have foxnews viewers lost sight of what this country was founded upon?
Would events have turned out the way they did with foxnews reporting such a biased opposition?
Or are these people the decendents of the royalist majority who sat in Manhattan and lived it up while General Washington and the Continental Army froze in Valley Forge?
Foxnews sure hates the French.
Would Benedict Arnold or Jim Crow have subbed for O'Reilly?
I happened across this site and got a big laugh, why does foxnews take such a "royalist" point of view, do you think foxnews would be on the "other" King George's side?
Enjoy and feel free to discuss, I would like to hear why foxnews would not take this side of the issues throughout history seeing their stances in modern times on related issues.
Have foxnews viewers lost sight of what this country was founded upon?
Would events have turned out the way they did with foxnews reporting such a biased opposition?
Or are these people the decendents of the royalist majority who sat in Manhattan and lived it up while General Washington and the Continental Army froze in Valley Forge?
Foxnews sure hates the French.
Would Benedict Arnold or Jim Crow have subbed for O'Reilly?