• We are currently experiencing delays with our email service, which may affect logins and notifications. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience while we work to resolve the issue.

PAR2-benchmarks for Conroe CPUs?

vsonerud

Junior Member
Aug 10, 2006
16
0
0
Hi!

Does anyone know of any published benchmarks for PAR2-generation/repair using Conroe CPUs?

Or maybe someone reading this forum who has a Conroe CPU could do a small test?

I am just very curious as to approx. how many MB/sec one is able to achieve for PAR2 generation using various Conroe CPUs, especially in comparison with AMD X2 CPUs

( I am currently considering a system upgrade - and PAR2 benchmarks are important for me as part of that decision-making )

 

aggressor

Platinum Member
Oct 10, 1999
2,079
0
76
I was just doing a few repairs last night and I was regularly getting 1100MB/s with my E6400@3ghz
 

vsonerud

Junior Member
Aug 10, 2006
16
0
0
OK, I had hoped it should be even faster.

I have seen other reports saying approx. this:

AMD X2 3800+ (stock speed): 750-800 MB/sec
AMD X2 3800+ (2.5 Ghz): 925 MB/sec
AMD X2 4800+ (stock speed): 930 MB/sec

My system - AMD Athlon XP 2200+: 375 MB/sec

 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
I do roughly 1300MB/s.

I've seen higher-clocked ones do 1500MB/s.

For reference, my old X2 was in the 800-850 neighborhood.
 

aggressor

Platinum Member
Oct 10, 1999
2,079
0
76
On stock? Strange. My memory timings are currently extremely loose, so maybe that's why mine is slower.
 

eelw

Lifer
Dec 4, 1999
10,307
5,466
136
Is PAR2 memory bottlenecked? It's only reported around 600MB/s on my E6400. I'm still using 512MB of DDR400 on my ASRock VSTA mobo. For comparison sake, my other 512MB stick is running in my old 3.4 Northwood. That system is reported at 400MB/s
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: eelw
Is PAR2 memory bottlenecked? It's only reported around 600MB/s on my E6400. I'm still using 512MB of DDR400 on my ASRock VSTA mobo. For comparison sake, my other 512MB stick is running in my old 3.4 Northwood. That system is reported at 400MB/s

Yes, RAM timing and bandwidth make a big difference. As does disk speed.

You should be doing better than 600MB/s on an E6400, even stock. I suspect the ASRock is holding you back.
 

eelw

Lifer
Dec 4, 1999
10,307
5,466
136
Just added the 512 stick from the other system and it jumped to 700MB/s. So yeah, definitely memory bandwidth limited.