Originally posted by: Tangerines
Then what do you watch, Fox?
I rarely watch television at all. The bias inherent in the news sources has gotten so bad that it really isn't worth watching.
Originally posted by: Tangerines
Then what do you watch, Fox?
The newspaper ? openly liberal by virtue of this opinion piece
Originally posted by: arsbanned
The newspaper ? openly liberal by virtue of this opinion piece
Pfffffffft. You can't be for real.
Originally posted by: Strk
It's really not a racist statement though. At most, they could have said African American. But can you at all disprove that Clarence Thomas doesn't represent African Americans as a whole? His career on the bench involves saying nothing, writing nothing and agreeing with Scalia.
Originally posted by: zendari
What if we labelled all rich blacks with an asterisk since they aren't the mainstream gangsta hoodlums? Bill Bennett says to abort black babies and the liberal media is all over him, but I guess now its ok to "asterisk" or throw oreos at others. :roll:
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: Strk
It's really not a racist statement though. At most, they could have said African American. But can you at all disprove that Clarence Thomas doesn't represent African Americans as a whole? His career on the bench involves saying nothing, writing nothing and agreeing with Scalia.
Come on, you can at least admit a similar comment about someone made by a Republican would ignite a firestorm in short order.
It isn't nearly as insensitive as Byrd's use of the N word or something along those lines, but still, dismissing it as 'nothing' shows either naivety or obfuscation.
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: Strk
It's really not a racist statement though. At most, they could have said African American. But can you at all disprove that Clarence Thomas doesn't represent African Americans as a whole? His career on the bench involves saying nothing, writing nothing and agreeing with Scalia.
Funny. They disagree 21% of the time. Text
What if we labelled all rich blacks with an asterisk since they aren't the mainstream gangsta hoodlums? Bill Bennett says to abort black babies and the liberal media is all over him, but I guess now its ok to "asterisk" or throw oreos at others. :roll:
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: Strk
It's really not a racist statement though. At most, they could have said African American. But can you at all disprove that Clarence Thomas doesn't represent African Americans as a whole? His career on the bench involves saying nothing, writing nothing and agreeing with Scalia.
Funny. They disagree 21% of the time. Text
What if we labelled all rich blacks with an asterisk since they aren't the mainstream gangsta hoodlums? Bill Bennett says to abort black babies and the liberal media is all over him, but I guess now its ok to "asterisk" or throw oreos at others. :roll:
Originally posted by: Strk
Yes, by agreeing with him 79% of the time doesn't prove anything about about Thomas and Scalia regularly agreeing with each other...... :roll:
Originally posted by: smack Down
Yes because adviocating geniocided is the same as saying a person doesn't represent the views of the mainstream black community.
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: Strk
Yes, by agreeing with him 79% of the time doesn't prove anything about about Thomas and Scalia regularly agreeing with each other...... :roll:
Must be tough to get through that remaining 21% by saying nothing, writing nothing, and agreeing with Scalia, and ending up disagreeing with him after all.
There are other judges in the 70s agreement rate.
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: smack Down
Yes because adviocating geniocided is the same as saying a person doesn't represent the views of the mainstream black community.
Abortion is now genocide?
Liberals hate blacks, and conservatives, guess its no surprise they have the utmost hatred for a black conservative.
Originally posted by: zendari
How about I talk to Robert Byrd?
Originally posted by: raildogg
Nothing surprising here. The radical leftists are the modern Nazis and many of them seem to control the Demoncatic party. They are saying that throwing oreos at conservative blacks is ok. Why are Demoncatic politicals saying it is okay to throw oreos at conservative blacks? Why do these people harrass conservative blacks?
Blacks cant be conservative now? Clarence Thomas was right when he said it is a high-tech lynching.
Originally posted by: raildogg
Nothing surprising here. The radical leftists are the modern Nazis and many of them seem to control the Demoncatic party. They are saying that throwing oreos at conservative blacks is ok. Why are Demoncatic politicals saying it is okay to throw oreos at conservative blacks? Why do these people harrass conservative blacks?
Blacks cant be conservative now? Clarence Thomas was right when he said it is a high-tech lynching.
Originally posted by: Strk
It's really not a racist statement though. At most, they could have said African American. But can you at all disprove that Clarence Thomas doesn't represent African Americans as a whole? His career on the bench involves saying nothing, writing nothing and agreeing with Scalia.