Am I the only one that envisions a new Palestinian conflict with the people that already live there?
Can not happen - the Arabs all over the world love the Palestinians ()
Am I the only one that envisions a new Palestinian conflict with the people that already live there?
I would accept this new land if only the Palestinians get to keep Jerusalem.
When the Arabs controlled Jerusalem, the Christians and Jews were not welcome.The Christians and Jews will not stand for it. If it wasn't for sites that are of great biblical importance to Christians in and around Jerusalem they wouldn't give a damn about Israel.
Please. The whole thing is just hasbara trolling. No offer was made. Your own link verifies the bullshit nature of it.
Please. The whole thing is just hasbara trolling. No offer was made. Your own link verifies the bullshit nature of it.
Please what? I was merely responding to those complaining about the location. Still seems much greener than you and others implied
That is NOT what your link says......are you that dense??There is no location because no offer was made. The only people claiming there was such an offer are the Israelis & repeaters.
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/egypts-sisi...insula-1464436
The whole thing is a troll by the IDF.
--- exactly!!What the link indicates is the Egypt stated one thing and the Palestinians rejected it.
To save face, now Egypt must deny the assistance of the idea.
That is NOT what your link says......are you that dense??
Egyptian President General Abdel Fatah al-Sisi has offered Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas the chance to create a Palestinian state in the Sinai Peninsula, according to local Israeli media.
The Israeli military radio station said that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had knowledge of the offer and that the United States had given its approval to such an idea.
It seems as if when Arabs controlled Jerusalem Christians was more welcomed than when Jews controlled Jerusalem.When the Arabs controlled Jerusalem, the Christians and Jews were not welcome.
As stated above; do you think that a place that is considered sacred to three major religions is going to be allowed to be restricted to one?
Since the creation of the state of Israel in 1948, Palestinian Christians have been subjected to brutal military occupation in their homelands. Israel does not differentiate between Palestinian Christians and Muslims when it carries out its occupational policies.
The Vatican and the Catholic Church blamed the Israeli occupation and the conflict in the Holy Land for the Christian exodus from the Holy Land and the Middle East in general...
In a 2006 poll of Christians in Bethlehem by the Palestinian Centre for Research and Cultural Dialogue, 90% reported having Muslim friends, 73.3% agreed that the Palestinian Authority treats Christian heritage in the city with respect, and 78% attributed the ongoing exodus of Christians from Bethlehem to the Israeli occupation and travel restrictions on the area.
What this is, is a wet dream for expansionist Zionists who could then full employ the pogrom of lebensraum and achieve ethnic cleansing in one foul swoop, and thereby to continue the illegal expropriation of extra-jurisdictional territory.If true, seems extraordinary to me. (I see it doesn't mention anything about Palestinians who prefer to remain in Israel.)
Fern
It is a crime to plan or incite genocide, even before killing starts, and to aid or abet genocide: Criminal acts include conspiracy, direct and public incitement, attempts to commit genocide, and complicity in genocide.
..
Deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to destroy a group includes the deliberate deprivation of resources needed for the group’s physical survival, such as clean water, food, clothing, shelter or medical services. Deprivation of the means to sustain life can be imposed through confiscation of harvests, blockade of foodstuffs, detention in camps, forcible relocation or expulsion into deserts.
There is no location because no offer was made. The only people claiming there was such an offer are the Israelis & repeaters.
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/egypts-sis...ion-palestinian-state-sinai-peninsula-1464436
The whole thing is a troll by the IDF.
Peace ain't possible via a criminally vile expansionist and supremacist pogrom such as lebensraum.I can see both sides of this.....the advantages and the disadvantages.....but shouldn`t Peace triumph??
Suddenly we are short of space here in Israel, which has become full to capacity and needs lebensraum. Every cultured person knows that this is a despicable German concept, banned from use because of the associations it brings up. Still, people are starting to use it, if not outright then with a clear implication: We are short of land, we are short of air, let us breathe in this country.
To the inflaming cost of their neighbours, a destructive "Greater Israel" is state policy.When we embarked on the Six-Day War did we want to remove a threat or did we want to gain control in order to spread out? That's what happens after 44 years of mire and moral corruption, which distort things and make us forget the original objective and replace it with an entirely different one. We were fortunate when we occupied the West Bank because had we not done so, where would we have come to live? And who knows how high housing prices would have risen? The divine promise is now being revealed in all its ability to prophesy about real estate.
The founding fathers, as opposed to the Diadochi who fought for control after Alexander the Great's death, represented a different approach, for the most part. Between "A little goes a long way," and "Don't bite off more than you can chew," they chose to bite; they even agreed to the 1947 UN partition plan for lack of choice. They believed that all the objectives of rational Ben Gurion-style Zionism could be fulfilled even in "Lesser Israel," which is more complete and more at peace with itself. And it has no need for lebensraum, may God preserve us.
JEDIYoda, you appear to advocate the genocide of a people. Destroy their community, presence, and viability from their home. You weigh the benefit of this marching of Palestinians into the Sinai as for the greater good as the mere presence of Palestinians in land coveted by expansionist Zionists, is troublesome for peace. A 1984 type of scenario where peace enforced via the territorial aggressors.Have to give up your original lands but in exchange get more land and peace?
So when several sources refer to remarks that Abbas himself made regarding such an offer do you think that he too was tricked by the IDF? It seems to me that no one would be talking about this if Abbas didn't claim it. Or do you think Abbas never said anything in the first place? This former Egyptian official doesn't seem to think so:
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/n...ister-dismisses-abbas-remarks-about-the-sinai
Then again, he also seems to be under the delusion that Morsi is still president so maybe he can't be taken too seriously afterall..
Try this on Fern: your neighbours don't like you, they want your home. NOW MOVE!It seems odd Abbas would dismiss it out-of-hand. I.e., no negotiating, just "no".
You FUCK'N supremacist vile peace of shit.Actually they [Palestinians] are stupid......look what the Israelis accomplished agriculturally with the land they had.....turning baren land in to food producing land...
You don't have good reading comprehension, do you? Your link references a supposed offer by former president Morsi, not General Sisi. There is difference. The author denies supposed claims by Abbas that such an offer was ever made.
Every credible story on the supposed July 17 offer goes right back to IDF radio claiming the deal was offered. Both the Pals & the Egyptians claim the offer was never made.
Israeli propaganda artists troll the world, again.
http://english.ahram.org.eg/News/110225.aspx
There is no location because no offer was made. The only people claiming there was such an offer are the Israelis & repeaters
Okay, but here we have another offer that Egypt is denying ever happening, but Abbas allegedly made remarks refusing. So how is it a stretch that that would happen again here? Or do you think Abbas never made comments about an offer from Morsi either, and that too was an IDF fabrication? I assume so, because you call them "supposed claims."
This isn't the first time I've seen reports of things Abbas said that were claimed to be Israeli fabrications. Some were saying that when it was reported that he was criticizing Hamas for misappropriating funds. You'd think if Abbas kept getting reported for saying things he never said he'd deny it (and yes, in this case it wasn't even Abbas who was alleged to receive an offer but Abu Mazen)
If there was no location why did you and others feel the need to comment on the location?
Because the source of the claim, the IDF, was not revealed until post #15 of this thread. Once that's understood, it's understood to be bullshit.
You feel that it is BS because it came from an Israeli source.
Israel has informational ties (leads/leaks/informants/etc) within the Palestinian organizations and also Egypt.
If such an idea was floated and shot down; why would the Arabs admit to such?
So Abbas lied about the offer to Ma'an news? They quoted him directly.They haven't, certainly not wrt Sisi & Abbas. They have denied it ever happened. The rest is IDF propaganda & obfuscation designed to paint the Pals as jerks.
So Abbas lied about the offer to Ma'an news? They quoted him directly.
I see now that it appears to be fabrication. But if it was true, they should have taken the land imo.Link.
