Palestinians Offered State Five Times The Size Of Palestine By Egyptian President

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

inachu

Platinum Member
Aug 22, 2014
2,387
2
41
That is the goal of israel. Take ownership of any and all resources and leave none for anyone else. The muslims just need to dig a super deep well that would just suck resources away from Israel. Happens all the time in USA in regards to water and oil.

A few lawsuit came about when farmers were accusing the other.
 

Orignal Earl

Diamond Member
Oct 27, 2005
8,059
55
86
More of your misinformation??

All that article does is word for word use excerpts from what I posted.....
I don`t see any conclusion at all.....

thus proving that the Palestinians he represents are more interested in replacing Israel rather than creating a peaceful state adjacent to their current borders.

Find this conclusion from your article in the original article.
That's called misinformation
 

inachu

Platinum Member
Aug 22, 2014
2,387
2
41
They are mostly european in ISrael anyway. They should move back to europe.
 

QuantumPion

Diamond Member
Jun 27, 2005
6,010
1
76
why don't the Israelis just give them back their land?

If land was the reason for the current conflict, then why did the arabs invade Israel in 1949 and 1967 to begin with? What makes you think, even if Israel went back to the 1949 borders, that the arabs would not declare war again for the same reason they did originally?
 

QuantumPion

Diamond Member
Jun 27, 2005
6,010
1
76
They are mostly european in ISrael anyway. They should move back to europe.

Well the palestinians are mostly Jordanians, why don't they move back to Jordan? After all, the Jews were there first, the arabs only moved in to the region after the Jews bought the land, made it fertile, and created a sustainable economy capable of supporting the population.
 

emperus

Diamond Member
Apr 6, 2012
7,807
1,560
126
What is the difference between this post and any other propaganda? Why doesn't Israel just take the land and start their own country there. I assume Israel wouldn't want to do that, so why would anyone else.

You really don't see Palestinians as human beings deservant of the same rights and expectations that other human beings do or Israeli's do.
 

nehalem256

Lifer
Apr 13, 2012
15,669
8
0
What is the difference between this post and any other propaganda? Why doesn't Israel just take the land and start their own country there. I assume Israel wouldn't want to do that, so why would anyone else.

You really don't see Palestinians as human beings deservant of the same rights and expectations that other human beings do or Israeli's do.

Israel already built a thriving country. Why in the world should they be expected to give in up and start over?

If land was the reason for the current conflict, then why did the arabs invade Israel in 1949 and 1967 to begin with? What makes you think, even if Israel went back to the 1949 borders, that the arabs would not declare war again for the same reason they did originally?

The whole idea of Israel going back to old borders is silly.

In what world do you get to refuse an agreement. Then throw a fit for 50 years and be a giant pain in the ass. Then decide that maybe it was a good agreement after all.
 

Orignal Earl

Diamond Member
Oct 27, 2005
8,059
55
86
Well the palestinians are mostly Jordanians, why don't they move back to Jordan? After all, the Jews were there first, the arabs only moved in to the region after the Jews bought the land, made it fertile, and created a sustainable economy capable of supporting the population.

"In taking, this action the Committee was fully aware that both Arabs and Jews advance strong claims to rights and interests in Palestine, the Arabs by virtue of being for centuries the indigenous and preponderant people there, and the Jews by virtue of historical association with the country and international pledges made to them respecting their rights in it. But the Committee also realized that the crux of the Palestine problem is to be found in the fact that two sizeable groups, an Arab population of over 1,200,000 and a Jewish population of over 600,000, with intense nationalist aspirations, are diffused throughout a country that is arid, limited in area, and poor in all essential resources.

https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/UN/UNSCOP.html
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
33,896
7,920
136
By all means, send the Palestinians to a place with no fresh water supply.

http://www.aldokkan.com/geography/sinai.htm

Isn't the land immediately adjacent to Gaza? Not some distant wasteland... it's just more of the desert they are presently in. Which isn't that good to begin with, but it's something.

The land is not a "sending" or "exchange". We would not allow them to be forced there. It's more of an opportunity. A peace agreement that hands them something, which would open the border, give them the chance at a better life.

It's the deal that's important, not the land itself.
 

realibrad

Lifer
Oct 18, 2013
12,337
898
126
The Sinai Peninsula is giving Egypt some political problems right now. Egypt figures kill 2 birds with 1 stone, and give the land away. You can get water to the region, which is why people already live there.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
The Sinai Peninsula is giving Egypt some political problems right now. Egypt figures kill 2 birds with 1 stone, and give the land away. You can get water to the region, which is why people already live there.

Lameness. The only productive land in the Sinai is a narrow strip along the Mediterranean where they get some rain. If you think that the Egyptians who live there want to become Palestinians, you're out of your mind.

If you think this thread is something more than the lies of Hasbara as told by our resident Hasbara troll, you're feeble minded.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Isn't the land immediately adjacent to Gaza? Not some distant wasteland... it's just more of the desert they are presently in. Which isn't that good to begin with, but it's something.

The land is not a "sending" or "exchange". We would not allow them to be forced there. It's more of an opportunity. A peace agreement that hands them something, which would open the border, give them the chance at a better life.

It's the deal that's important, not the land itself.

What makes you think it would open the border? What makes you think that Egypt would turn over the only productive land in the Sinai & its inhabitants to the pals?

Use google maps satellite view to understand what you're blathering mindlessly about.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Fucking hell. ENOUGH OF THIS childish feud. Convince the two sides that both sides are the same, and fucking blend in. no need to be my side and your side when they can both be on the same fucking side and then nobody will lose out. Stubborn assholes run both sides.
That or just flip a coin. Whoever loses moves to Sinai, including all Holy lands and spots. Mohammed now ascended to Heaven in a dream from Sinai/Moses now led his people to the promised land in Sinai. The Wailing Wall is now ONLY the mosque, or vice versa. No backsies.
 

Exterous

Super Moderator
Jun 20, 2006
20,471
3,589
126
Lameness. The only productive land in the Sinai is a narrow strip along the Mediterranean where they get some rain.

Isn't that the part that was allegedly offered? Looking at google maps it doesn't seem nearly as barren as others in this thread have suggested:

Map

map

It actually looks greener than the Gaza strip itself
 

Exterous

Super Moderator
Jun 20, 2006
20,471
3,589
126
Is this where we pretend Sinai is not a desert and this is a great deal?

You won't find any of that in the Sinai.

By all means, send the Palestinians to a place with no fresh water supply.

http://www.aldokkan.com/geography/sinai.htm

Someone is managing to grow green things there. Besides - the alleged report offers them this land in addition to Gaza itself

The new territory, composed of Gaza together with the extra land in Sinai,

http://www.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Conflict/Egypt-PA-deny-report-that-Sisi-offered-Abbas-land-in-Sinai-for-Palestinian-state-374785

If offered it seems like it is a heck of a lot better than what they have now esp given that I see a rather large swath of green land in the 'offered' area although a lot of that depends on what area was actually 'offered'
 

surfsatwerk

Lifer
Mar 6, 2008
10,110
5
81
Am I the only one that envisions a new Palestinian conflict with the people that already live there?
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Someone is managing to grow green things there. Besides - the alleged report offers them this land in addition to Gaza itself



http://www.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Conflict/Egypt-PA-deny-report-that-Sisi-offered-Abbas-land-in-Sinai-for-Palestinian-state-374785

If offered it seems like it is a heck of a lot better than what they have now esp given that I see a rather large swath of green land in the 'offered' area although a lot of that depends on what area was actually 'offered'

Please. The whole thing is just hasbara trolling. No offer was made. Your own link verifies the bullshit nature of it.
 

inachu

Platinum Member
Aug 22, 2014
2,387
2
41
Well the palestinians are mostly Jordanians, why don't they move back to Jordan? After all, the Jews were there first, the arabs only moved in to the region after the Jews bought the land, made it fertile, and created a sustainable economy capable of supporting the population.

Israel will land grab some of Jordan.

No matter where they go then an Israeli will be there because of END TIME CULT IDEOLOGIES.
 

Oyeve

Lifer
Oct 18, 1999
21,980
847
126
I would accept this new land if only the Palestinians get to keep Jerusalem.