- Aug 25, 2001
- 56,570
- 10,202
- 126
I recently (on a whim) bought a couple of XFX R7 260X 2GB GPUs. Was wondering which was the more appropriate platform to pair them up with.
I also picked up a couple of G1610 CPUs, to go with a pair of H61 boards I bought a while ago.
So, I've also got a pair of heavily-used (and OCed for most of their life, though no longer) Q9300 / P35 / 8GB DDR2 rigs, with PCI-E x16 v1.1.
I have kits of DDR3 for the G1610 / H61 rigs, the boards have two slots.
According to this TechSpot article, the G1820 is faster than the Q9650, in several popular games.
http://www.techspot.com/article/1039-ten-years-intel-cpu-compared/page5.html
I'm wondering if the G1820 is an appropriate proxy for the G1610, or if there is a significant performance difference between them for gaming purposes, and if the G1610 is faster than a 2.5Ghz Q9300 C2Q.
My G3258 CPUs are currently in H81 mobos, with 8GB of DDR3-1600 (which can only run a max of DDR3-1400 in that mobo), with 7950 3GB.
I also picked up a couple of G1610 CPUs, to go with a pair of H61 boards I bought a while ago.
So, I've also got a pair of heavily-used (and OCed for most of their life, though no longer) Q9300 / P35 / 8GB DDR2 rigs, with PCI-E x16 v1.1.
I have kits of DDR3 for the G1610 / H61 rigs, the boards have two slots.
According to this TechSpot article, the G1820 is faster than the Q9650, in several popular games.
http://www.techspot.com/article/1039-ten-years-intel-cpu-compared/page5.html
I'm wondering if the G1820 is an appropriate proxy for the G1610, or if there is a significant performance difference between them for gaming purposes, and if the G1610 is faster than a 2.5Ghz Q9300 C2Q.
My G3258 CPUs are currently in H81 mobos, with 8GB of DDR3-1600 (which can only run a max of DDR3-1400 in that mobo), with 7950 3GB.
Last edited: