- Apr 29, 2005
- 5,649
- 0
- 0
I know that the CEO/owners of this hospital have this right and I respect that. However, is it a sound business decision to make this threat and issue this ultimatum (that they will close the hospital before negotiate with the union)?
I don't think so personally. I know that the hard thing to do for the workers would be to take a stand and loose their jobs, but I think that they gain the leverage in the long run.
First off, the owners would take a HUGE loss if they followed through on their threat. I'm sure that some of them have mortgaged their personal assets to get the money to purchase the hospital from the previous owners. Secondly, if the workers concede to the threats now, they will never, ever get anything in return other than a paycheck that will not keep up with inflation because the owners will resume the same hardball tactics that worked this time around. Obviously, from the bolded sections below, the CEO/owner's word isn't worth all that much.
I'd like to read some of your thoughts about it. Oh, and to keep the flames at a minimum, I have stated, and I'm sure that everyone else agrees with me on this, that it is well within their rights as owners to do this. I am hoping to get opinions about thesensibility of the decision to handle the "negotiations" in this manner. Not whether or not they can.
Source
I don't think so personally. I know that the hard thing to do for the workers would be to take a stand and loose their jobs, but I think that they gain the leverage in the long run.
First off, the owners would take a HUGE loss if they followed through on their threat. I'm sure that some of them have mortgaged their personal assets to get the money to purchase the hospital from the previous owners. Secondly, if the workers concede to the threats now, they will never, ever get anything in return other than a paycheck that will not keep up with inflation because the owners will resume the same hardball tactics that worked this time around. Obviously, from the bolded sections below, the CEO/owner's word isn't worth all that much.
I'd like to read some of your thoughts about it. Oh, and to keep the flames at a minimum, I have stated, and I'm sure that everyone else agrees with me on this, that it is well within their rights as owners to do this. I am hoping to get opinions about thesensibility of the decision to handle the "negotiations" in this manner. Not whether or not they can.
Source
Brownsville hospital owner gives ultimatum to workers
Friday, January 06, 2006
AP
A hospital will close within 90 days unless its unionized employees agree to concessions and withdraw unfair labor charges, its chief executive officer said.
"You know what I want. Give it to me and I will not close this hospital," Gary Gosai, chief executive officer of Tara Hospital, told employees yesterday.
The ultimatum came two days after the nurse's union, the Pennsylvania State Education Association, voted unanimously to allow its negotiators to call a strike if contract talks are unsuccessful.
The former nonprofit Brownsville General Hospital was renamed in June after a group of physicians purchased it and made it a for-profit operation. The new owners said they planned to increase staff and turn the business around, but at least 60 employees have been laid off in the past two months and all licensed practical nursing positions were eliminated.
Investors have lost at least $1.5 million in assuming ownership of the hospital, Mr. Gosai said.
"There isn't going to be any negotiations from now on," Mr. Gosai said. "It's all up to you."
Denise Seman, president of the nurses' union, said both sides have to work together. She said Mr. Gosai threatened to close the hospital before, when the nurses complained about the contract offer, and "then said it was a misunderstanding."