Originally posted by: LegionX
why arent they technically considered doublesided? i have a stick of samsung 512 DDR 333 that has chips on both sides and figured it was double sided which sucks becuase my msi 648 max-L can only handle 3 banks and so cant get another stick of the same memory. could i be wrong about my memory then?
The terms "single-sided" and "double-sides" refer more in terms of the electrical connections, not the physical construction, although they are often the same (but not always).
Generally speaking (at least from the days of 72-pin SIMMs, not sure if DIMMs are the same), there are a limited number of RAS (row address strobe/"bank select") lines coming off of the chipset and wired to the memory slots. Depending on the number of memory slots and RAS signals available, some of those RAS lines may actually be wired to more than one memory slot, both to the second ("backside") RAS signal of one memory bank, and the first ("frontside") RAS signal of another. Now, I understand that DIMMs are internally banked, and generally are referred to as "DIMM x" instead of "BANK x" of memory. So I'm not sure if this is still directly applicable or not. But the general principle is the same - some memory slots share signals with others, and "double-sided" memory uses a pair of these signals, whereas "single-sided" only uses one set. (The general address lines are always shared with every bank.)
So in your case, the chipset only handles 3 "banks" of RAM, and that DIMM that you have, is "double-sided", and therefore uses up two of those banks, leaving only a single bank-select/RAS line free. So you cannot use an additional double-sided DIMM, you may only use one that is single-sided.