Hmmmm ... please see the posts here by "Jim Bimby":-
http://www.asusboards.com/forums/showthread.php?s=f253b1b5ace93bbf2b736a0a8c0ea143&threadid=44874
I also am a P4b533 owner and also am a "regular" KingstonVALUE ram user [ never had a problem with it ] and was wondering
=> Is what this guy is saying probalby correct about DDR 400, or is it more likely to be a "bad" stick ?
I'd be inclined to think it was a bad stick if it was playing up at 200mhz, but given he reckons the problems are at 167mhz and even 133mhz - well below what the DDR is rated at - maybe his conclusion is right.
Is DDR 400 this "finecky" ?
Ben BEIF Ifin
http://www.asusboards.com/forums/showthread.php?s=f253b1b5ace93bbf2b736a0a8c0ea143&threadid=44874
I also am a P4b533 owner and also am a "regular" KingstonVALUE ram user [ never had a problem with it ] and was wondering
=> Is what this guy is saying probalby correct about DDR 400, or is it more likely to be a "bad" stick ?
I'd be inclined to think it was a bad stick if it was playing up at 200mhz, but given he reckons the problems are at 167mhz and even 133mhz - well below what the DDR is rated at - maybe his conclusion is right.
Is DDR 400 this "finecky" ?
Ben BEIF Ifin
Facebook
Twitter