Saw the following over at the asusboards forum here:-
http://www.asusboards.com/forums/showthread.php?s=fa5988136f9a894cd496cb3ad14327f6&threadid=39820
Everything "William" wrote makes %100 perfect sense to me.
Can anyone see / think why the new PIV's with the 200 mhz fsb would NOT run on a P4B533 ?
I look at is this way - *hopefully* we will be able to run a 2.8 H/T PIV with say a modest overclock to say a 230mhz fsb - that would give us 14 x 230 = 3.22gig running at a 230 mhz fsb *with* H/T all on our super-trusty P4B533's !!!!
And anyway, *assuming* the above will work, who gives a rats-ass about using single channel DDR vs dual-channel DDR - all reports so far are showing *very* minimalperfomance increases [ around %3 - %5 ] going from single-channel DDR to dual-chanell DDR.
Benny [ BEIF ] Ifin
Mucho-satisfied P4B533 owner

http://www.asusboards.com/forums/showthread.php?s=fa5988136f9a894cd496cb3ad14327f6&threadid=39820
Everything "William" wrote makes %100 perfect sense to me.
Can anyone see / think why the new PIV's with the 200 mhz fsb would NOT run on a P4B533 ?
I look at is this way - *hopefully* we will be able to run a 2.8 H/T PIV with say a modest overclock to say a 230mhz fsb - that would give us 14 x 230 = 3.22gig running at a 230 mhz fsb *with* H/T all on our super-trusty P4B533's !!!!
And anyway, *assuming* the above will work, who gives a rats-ass about using single channel DDR vs dual-channel DDR - all reports so far are showing *very* minimalperfomance increases [ around %3 - %5 ] going from single-channel DDR to dual-chanell DDR.
Benny [ BEIF ] Ifin
Mucho-satisfied P4B533 owner