• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

P4 @ 4.3ghz!!! pics here :)

lol that is a 2.8 (21x133) @ 4.3 (21x206) THAT SUCKER RUNS ON A 824mhz FSB!!! = PC-1648 corsair rimm!!! Not pc-800, not pc-1066, not pc-1200....PC-1648!! and it posted
 
While that is cool and all, what is the point. I don't think that anyone will go through the trouble of liquid nitrogen cooling at home.
 
From a pure 'technical' standpoint...this is fascinating to me...this is the equivalant of an open-class top-fuel dragster reaching a speed of 350 miles an hour on a new fuel. Try this on your 82' chrysler? no.... Go in the bleachers with some popcorn and coke & watch a pro drive a dragster to 350 mph? yes...
 
Originally posted by: fkloster
lol that is a 2.8 (21x133) @ 4.3 (21x206) THAT SUCKER RUNS ON A 824mhz FSB!!! = PC-1648 corsair rimm!!! Not pc-800, not pc-1066, not pc-1200....PC-1648!! and it posted
Click to expand...

another ordinary day at muropaketti.com 🙂. As to the clock.speed.... It POSTED on 4.3GHz, but that's all it did, Highest it ran stable was 3998MHz.
 
Originally posted by: Nemesis77
Originally posted by: fkloster
lol that is a 2.8 (21x133) @ 4.3 (21x206) THAT SUCKER RUNS ON A 824mhz FSB!!! = PC-1648 corsair rimm!!! Not pc-800, not pc-1066, not pc-1200....PC-1648!! and it posted
Click to expand...

another ordinary day at muropaketti.com 🙂. As to the clock.speed.... It POSTED on 4.3GHz, but that's all it did, Highest it ran stable was 3998MHz.
Click to expand...


Never the less... its till 4000...

😀

 
I think he got his temps wrong. Liquid nitrogen is about -77C, not -196C. Maybe it should be 196K, that'd be closer to the actualy temperature of liquid nitrogen.

Wow look at his memory tests... SiSoft says that his RDRam is 113% efficient.
 
fkloster: If you handle LN2 WITHOUT GLOVES, then I'd think you're crazy!😀


edit:I hope he, at least, wore safety glasses! Bragging rights are good. But not that good.😎 <--Safety glasses!
 
Originally posted by: jjsole
<FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #c0c0c0"><STRONG>21 multiplier???</STRONG> :Q

how is this possible?
</FONT>
Click to expand...

21x is the native multiplier for the 2.8

The 2.6A has a 26x multiplier

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top