• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

P0LL: Who came first? Man or woman?

biologically man is derivative of woman... well at least, undifferentiated fetuses have a lot more in common with female biology than male..

If you think about it there's a lot more shaping an changing that has to be done to get male genitalia.
 
iirc all babies are female, then something triggers them to become male. (this is why we men have nipples - develop them before sex is determined). basing off that, i would say female
 
Originally posted by: isasir
The guy usually comes first.
Click to expand...

:laugh:

I believe the Bible to be true, so I believe man came first. Then, woman had to be made, because man was completely lost. 🙂
 
Originally posted by: djheater
biologically man is derivative of woman... well at least, undifferentiated fetuses have a lot more in common with female biology than male..

If you think about it there's a lot more shaping an changing that has to be done to get male genitalia.
Click to expand...

damn sounds like my kind of woman...here it is about 11:30am on my first day off for the next week, doing spring cleaning 😉 and have consumed 6 beers so far...I am averaging 6 a day though lately with end of year bullsh!t :evil:

to the others that say the guy is first...once you get some more under your belt and know the dividends holding out can bring you slow down.

It works against you though when you are tired and just want to de-nut and sleep 🙂
 
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: djheater
biologically man is derivative of woman... well at least, undifferentiated fetuses have a lot more in common with female biology than male..

If you think about it there's a lot more shaping an changing that has to be done to get male genitalia.
Click to expand...

damn sounds like my kind of woman...here it is about 11:30am on my first day off for the next week, doing spring cleaning 😉 and have consumed 6 beers so far...I am averaging 6 a day though lately with end of year bullsh!t :evil:

to the others that say the guy is first...once you get some more under your belt and know the dividends holding out can bring you slow down.

It works against you though when you are tired and just want to de-nut and sleep 🙂
Click to expand...

:thumbsup:

We need more posts like this.

:beer:
 
Originally posted by: MogulMonster
Originally posted by: isasir
The guy usually comes first.
Click to expand...

:laugh:

I believe the Bible to be true, so I believe man came first. Then, woman had to be made, because man was completely lost. 🙂
Click to expand...

not true....man was happy, God was just tired of hearing complaints from sheep.
 
All joking aside...

Lets say you go back in time to the point where some other species was about to evolve into our species. So you've got a bunch of Homo Erectus (or whatever) hanging around, and then one is born as a Homo Sapien. (The actual difference would have been slight, but enough for modern sicence to designate as a new species.) This first "prototype" could have been a man or a woman. It would have then mated with a Homo Erectus, and managed to produce Homo Sapien offspring. The new species could have taken off from there.

My understanding of evolution is elementary at best, but this sort of scenario seems plausable. I think people have trouble with evolution because they try to imagine a dinosaur giving birth to a chicken, or a chimp giving birth to Oprah. The actual process would have been much more gradual, almost indistinguishable. Only now do we look back at the fossil record, and lump them all into categories.
 
Originally posted by: VictorLazlo
All joking aside...

Lets say you go back in time to the point where some other species was about to evolve into our species. So you've got a bunch of Homo Erectus (or whatever) hanging around, and then one is born as a Homo Sapien. (The actual difference would have been slight, but enough for modern sicence to designate as a new species.) This first "prototype" could have been a man or a woman. It would have then mated with a Homo Erectus, and managed to produce Homo Sapien offspring. The new species could have taken off from there.

My understanding of evolution is elementary at best, but this sort of scenario seems plausable. I think people have trouble with evolution because they try to imagine a dinosaur giving birth to a chicken, or a chimp giving birth to Oprah. The actual process would have been much more gradual, almost indistinguishable. Only now do we look back at the fossil record, and lump them all into categories.
Click to expand...

How species-centric of you 🙂 I took man\woman to be the origin of sexual reproduction.
 
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: VictorLazlo
All joking aside...

Lets say you go back in time to the point where some other species was about to evolve into our species. So you've got a bunch of Homo Erectus (or whatever) hanging around, and then one is born as a Homo Sapien. (The actual difference would have been slight, but enough for modern sicence to designate as a new species.) This first "prototype" could have been a man or a woman. It would have then mated with a Homo Erectus, and managed to produce Homo Sapien offspring. The new species could have taken off from there.

My understanding of evolution is elementary at best, but this sort of scenario seems plausable. I think people have trouble with evolution because they try to imagine a dinosaur giving birth to a chicken, or a chimp giving birth to Oprah. The actual process would have been much more gradual, almost indistinguishable. Only now do we look back at the fossil record, and lump them all into categories.
Click to expand...

How species-centric of you 🙂 I took man\woman to be the origin of sexual reproduction.
Click to expand...

Ah, I see. The thread would have been clearer if it said "male or female" instead of "man or woman". The latter has human connotation.
 
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: djheater
biologically man is derivative of woman... well at least, undifferentiated fetuses have a lot more in common with female biology than male..

If you think about it there's a lot more shaping an changing that has to be done to get male genitalia.
Click to expand...

damn sounds like my kind of woman...here it is about 11:30am on my first day off for the next week, doing spring cleaning 😉 and have consumed 6 beers so far...I am averaging 6 a day though lately with end of year bullsh!t :evil:

to the others that say the guy is first...once you get some more under your belt and know the dividends holding out can bring you slow down.

It works against you though when you are tired and just want to de-nut and sleep 🙂
Click to expand...

:thumbsup:

We need more posts like this.

:beer:
Click to expand...

still true but I was replying to your sig:
Originally posted by: Garion
Get her a keg. That way, she can drink all the beer she wants each night and isn't limited to that 12 pack. If she's really pouding down a half case of beer every night and stops when she's out, what will happen when the beer DOESN'T run out?
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top