Women cops, women firefighters, should be seen as a bright beacon of PC failure.
Not saying some women can't do these jobs, but PC isn't about that, its about lowering standards until an average woman meets the phony requirements.
Which should not happen. Any requirement that
functional standards for the core activities of any job be changed is bullshit. Luckily the law only requires
non core standards be dropped if they have an adverse impact on a protected class.
For example: If your job is stocking shelves and you have to lift 100lb boxes to do it, then that can be part of the requirements. However, if your job is to mop the floor and once every few years there's a 100lb box that it would be nice to have the floor-moper put up, then that cannot be part of the requirements
if it adversely impacts a protected group who would otherwise have access to the job.
It's not about making a woman who can't lift 200lbs of dead weight a firefighter; it's about not stoping her from being a firefighter when she passes that test but fails the "has a dick" test.
The amount of ignorance amongst the general population, and even some of the HR folks I've met at SHERM, regarding what equal opportunity means is truly astounding. Affirmative action, too, has nothing to do with quotas: but about advertising and attempting to recruit for a job outside of the typical social networks where in you find a homogenous population.
In fact, unless court-ordered; the use of quotas can be a point of contention used by a different protected class to show adverse impact against them. For example, hispanic quotas may be used by people with functional autism to show that there's an adverse impact: because the rate of autism in the hispanic community is significantly lower. Quotas are a no-win situation and only open you up to a law suit: a lawyer that advises otherwise is either looking to get into a litigious payday or ignorant.
(but again, ignorant professionals are more often the rule than the exception).