- Aug 16, 2001
- 22,505
- 4
- 81
Originally posted by: Amused
http://www.overstock.com/cgi-bin/d2.cgi...IID=9246&PAGE=staticpage&page_id=2440#
No they aren't. Not all products from developing nations are made in "sweatshops."
If we did no business at all with them, we would be dooming them to perpetual poverty.
This is one of those liberal double standards. We're damned if we do, damned if we don't.
Meanwhile, the surest way to lift these countries up is with free and open trade.
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Originally posted by: Amused
http://www.overstock.com/cgi-bin/d2.cgi...IID=9246&PAGE=staticpage&page_id=2440#
No they aren't. Not all products from developing nations are made in "sweatshops."
If we did no business at all with them, we would be dooming them to perpetual poverty.
This is one of those liberal double standards. We're damned if we do, damned if we don't.
Meanwhile, the surest way to lift these countries up is with free and open trade.
Sweatshops aren't a way to lift those countries up, so where's the liberal double standard?
Originally posted by: glen
Sweatshops ARE the ONLY way those countries make money.
Take it away from them and they are in serious trouble.
Originally posted by: glen
Sweatshops ARE the ONLY way those countries make money.
Take it away from them and they are in serious trouble.
Originally posted by: glen
Sweatshops ARE the ONLY way those countries make money.
Take it away from them and they are in serious trouble.
Originally posted by: Kipper
Originally posted by: glen
Sweatshops ARE the ONLY way those countries make money.
Take it away from them and they are in serious trouble.
Wrong again.
Originally posted by: Kipper
Originally posted by: glen
Sweatshops ARE the ONLY way those countries make money.
Take it away from them and they are in serious trouble.
Wrong again.
Originally posted by: cvstrat
They show some crazy looking people in the commercial. I don't really know if it is promoting sweat shops or not, but it seems to me that if you can take someone in Vietnam and make his/her products available to millions on the net then that person would be hella happy. Beats only marketing to the poor people around the village.
Originally posted by: FrustratedUser
I have no problem buying cheap stuff, that's not the point. The point is that O-stock is trying to sell a lie to us consumers.
They try to make you believe that they actually go to the local craftsman on the corner in a country and buys his weekly production of pots, pans, belts or whatever.
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Maybe we should ask those working in the sweatshops whether they appreciate having at least something. Better yet, why dont we ask the average American consumer if they want to pay 400 dollars for a pair of nikes to save little timmy in indonesia (exaggeration of course).
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Maybe we should ask those working in the sweatshops whether they appreciate having at least something. Better yet, why dont we ask the average American consumer if they want to pay 400 dollars for a pair of nikes to save little timmy in indonesia (exaggeration of course).
This line of thinking got my crucified in a sociology course I took.
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Maybe we should ask those working in the sweatshops whether they appreciate having at least something. Better yet, why dont we ask the average American consumer if they want to pay 400 dollars for a pair of nikes to save little timmy in indonesia (exaggeration of course).
This line of thinking got me crucified in a Sociology course I took.
Really? Is it fundamentally flawed? Or just not humanitarian enough?