Overclocking Review Typo ?

[mattg1981]

This has to be a typo right?

LINK

I dont believe that top one .. but even the p2 400 up to 2.6 Ghz?

 

[Corporate Thug]

i dont believe it

 

[Stormgiant]

I wouldn't trust much that site...

many things don't add up from top to bottom results...

 

[klah]

Just go to 'Add your results'. They are obviously unmoderated.

 

[Acanthus]

Thats way way off.

 

[jagec]

they rated the 1.6a way low compared to overclockers.com ...I currently have a 1.6a machine sitting next to me running stable at 2.4 GHz. It would go higher, too, except my max vcore is like 1.65V :roll:

 

[MichaelZ]

i got a P1 133mhz oc'd to 5.13 ghz. much better than that p2 400 @ 2.6ghz.

 

[bandana163]

The C1500@9500 is impressive.
I've mailed them about this before, but they obviously don't care.

 

[Boyne7]

obviously almost every stat on that page is fake.

 

[clarkey01]

Intel Pentium 3 Tualatin 1.5 GHz overclocked to 9.5 GHz, LOL

 

[clarkey01]

I read over hear IBM showed a 10 Ghz chip on a 0.13 micron process, its old but i thought id bring it up

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/12/11/ibm_reveals_10ghz1/

just think of the 3D Mark score with that an ATI X800 XT under the hood