As I've become a little more cautious with my beloved PC hardware, I've been making an attempt to be "safer" while seeing how far I can push my hardware. It's sort of like wearing a bicycle helmet while cliff diving, but it makes me more comfortable with what I'm doing.
Tin foil hats aside, I've been trying to find my max values using ClockGen first (with the exception of RAM timings and voltage stuff). Once I find something that seems stable for a little while, I'll set it in the BIOS and try to make it crash, and tweak from there. To me, it almost feels "lazy" but so far I have had fewer problems than I used to when only using the BIOS.
Is there any reason that OCing in this manner is inferior to using only the BIOS? Could it create problems I'm not aware of, like having a hard time starting up if the computer is shut down for awhile, since the CPU, chipset, etc are already reasonably warm and happy within Windows when finding values with ClockGen? Or am I being superstitious?
Any input is appreciated!
Tin foil hats aside, I've been trying to find my max values using ClockGen first (with the exception of RAM timings and voltage stuff). Once I find something that seems stable for a little while, I'll set it in the BIOS and try to make it crash, and tweak from there. To me, it almost feels "lazy" but so far I have had fewer problems than I used to when only using the BIOS.
Is there any reason that OCing in this manner is inferior to using only the BIOS? Could it create problems I'm not aware of, like having a hard time starting up if the computer is shut down for awhile, since the CPU, chipset, etc are already reasonably warm and happy within Windows when finding values with ClockGen? Or am I being superstitious?
Any input is appreciated!