overclocking i5-750 vs. power consumption (article)

Discussion in 'CPUs and Overclocking' started by biostud, Feb 1, 2010.

  1. Loading...

    Similar Threads - overclocking power consumption Forum Date
    Overclocking CPU - Which PSU/Case? How much power? CPUs and Overclocking Oct 3, 2014
    FX-6300 Overclocked Power consumption CPUs and Overclocking Sep 15, 2013
    Overclocking i5 3570K Power Usage?? CPUs and Overclocking Mar 21, 2013
    Is it possible to overclock a 2500k with all power saving features on? CPUs and Overclocking Aug 3, 2012
    Question about Overclocking and POWER consumption CPUs and Overclocking Oct 7, 2002

  2. ShawnD1

    ShawnD1 Lifer

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Messages:
    16,000
    Likes Received:
    0
    Interesting article. Seems fairly consistent with what we've seen with other processors - eventually they hit a wall and power demand goes through the roof.

    One can use the stock voltage as a reference for where the zone of efficiency is. For all of my processors, power demand goes waaaay up once the frequency limit at stock voltage is reached.
     
  3. cbn

    cbn Lifer

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2009
    Messages:
    11,490
    Likes Received:
    117
  4. Munky

    Munky Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2005
    Messages:
    9,377
    Likes Received:
    0
    Interesting stuff. I experimented briefly with and overclock keeping dynamic turbo enabled, but testing for stability is more tricky and time consuming that way.

    However, from reading this article and seeing how very few of my workloads use all 4 cores/8 threads, I'm tempted to give it another shot.
     
  5. edplayer

    edplayer Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2002
    Messages:
    2,186
    Likes Received:
    0
    nice article

    Makes me want to move to the i5 750 but I still think I will wait to see what 32nm quad cores pop up and hear more about when native USB 3 and SATA 6Gbps are coming out.
     
  6. Lonyo

    Lonyo Lifer

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Messages:
    21,939
    Likes Received:
    2
    Would have been interesting to see some underclocking and undervolting too, but can't have everything!
     
  7. lopri

    lopri Elite Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2002
    Messages:
    12,348
    Likes Received:
    172
    It's one of the reasons why I'm waiting for 32nm processors for my next upgrades. I have been at 3.60 GHz for way too long.. 3.60 GHz seems like a sweet spot for 45nm quads when you consider performance/power/heat and overall system longevity.
     
  8. Tsavo

    Tsavo Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2009
    Messages:
    2,622
    Likes Received:
    1
    I wonder how to get Turbo to work when ocing...I set the BCLK on my Giagbyte P55 UD3R and Turbo stops working, even if I have it set to enabled in the BIOS.
     
  9. nyker96

    nyker96 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    5,629
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think this is true for most generation of cpus, the final 10% of oc headroom can only be reached with significant voltage increase make it not too economical. but for most enthusiasts power usage isn't that much of a concern.
     
  10. Munky

    Munky Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2005
    Messages:
    9,377
    Likes Received:
    0
    It depends on the board and the bios. On my asus board dynamic turbo still works even when raising the base clock, but I've read the newer bios "fixes" that issue, and that's one reason I'm staying away from the later bios.
     
  11. lothar

    lothar Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2000
    Messages:
    6,674
    Likes Received:
    7
    What cooler did they use?
     
  12. M0RPH

    M0RPH Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,305
    Likes Received:
    0
    Interesting. Took a look at the i7 article and from that it seems pretty dumb to go over 3.8 GHz. So why are so many people here so intent on overclocking the i7 to 4+ GHz? Maybe more folks need to take a look at that article.
     
  13. MrK6

    MrK6 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2004
    Messages:
    4,438
    Likes Received:
    1
    I agree. Through my own testing I've been trying to find an overclock that maximizes efficiency, and 3.6GHz (give or take 50MHz, I don't have enough time to pinpoint it) seems to be the sweet spot.

    One thing I'm surprised they didn't include in the article (maybe they didn't spend enough time with the chip) is that you can increase efficiency once you turn off the i5's power saving features if you enable Vdroop correction. It's still not an efficient way to run the CPU, but if you're going for maximum overclocks, it's the best solution.