Overclocking Hall of Fame

poofyhairguy

Lifer
Nov 20, 2005
14,612
318
126
If there was such a thing as the Overclocking Hall of Fame, what CPUs would go in it? Here is my list so far (all Intel not on purpose) of CPUs that once overclocked turned into beasts that far outlasted competing chips:

-Celeron 300A
-Q6600
-2500K

What should be added?
 

BonzaiDuck

Lifer
Jun 30, 2004
16,558
1,983
126
If there was such a thing as the Overclocking Hall of Fame, what CPUs would go in it? Here is my list so far (all Intel not on purpose) of CPUs that once overclocked turned into beasts that far outlasted competing chips:

-Celeron 300A
-Q6600
-2500K

What should be added?

Q6600 notwithstanding, I thought the E8600 was pretty phenomenal even for a C2D Wolfdale.

Yesitwas . . . . yesitwas . . .
 

poofyhairguy

Lifer
Nov 20, 2005
14,612
318
126
Q6600 notwithstanding, I thought the E8600 was pretty phenomenal even for a C2D Wolfdale.

I thought about putting the E6600 on the list, as early Conroes could overclock nearly as well as Wolfdales. That is 2008-level performance in 2006.
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,466
3,067
121
I'd agree on the Q6600.

I7 920 was good for the little ah heck also, I never owned the other two.

I still think the current L5639/X5650 etc do pretty good for what they are, using a few variants in what the 920's were in.

Not phenomenal, but pretty nice upgrades on an old chipset/socket.
 
Last edited:

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
I'd agree on the Q6600.

I7 920 was good for the little ah heck also, I never owned the other two.

I still think the current X5650 etc do pretty good for what they are, using a few variants in what the 920's were in.

Not phenomenal, but pretty nice upgrades on an old chipset/socket.

Considering this released almost 7 years ago and is STILL a decent gaming CPU speaks volumes.

+1 for the i7 920.
 

MrTeal

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2003
3,918
2,708
136
E2140 was pretty phenomenal as well as a budget CPU, close to 100% overclocks on the table there.
Not exactly the same, but some of the Sargas Semprons were outstanding if you could unlock them to a dual core and then go from 2.7GHz to 3.5GHz+
 

poofyhairguy

Lifer
Nov 20, 2005
14,612
318
126
E2140 was pretty phenomenal as well as a budget CPU, close to 100% overclocks on the table there.

Part of it is the lower clocks it has. It is almost like overclocking cheating. I would think something like a Intel Pentium G3258 would get on the list first.


Not exactly the same, but some of the Sargas Semprons were outstanding if you could unlock them to a dual core and then go from 2.7GHz to 3.5GHz+

That is a good example I think. I figured that was what would get AMD on here, unlockable cores. I was thinking about Tri-Core models that could be quadcore, I forgot about the Sempron.
 

Burpo

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2013
4,223
473
126
Xeon L5639.. 6 yr old, 60 watt, Hexcore. I know of no other cpu that can run 2X it's rated speed (2.13ghz) & still be stable.

 
Last edited:

cbn

Lifer
Mar 27, 2009
12,968
221
106
q9550 over 7 years old and still can game.

My vote also goes to the Xeon E5440 (which is the 80 watt TDP equivalent of the Q9550).

Currently it is $18 shipped on ebay "buy it now auctions" and be overclocked just like the Q9550.

Side Note: It does need a LGA 771 to LGA 775 adapter sticker (~$2 to $3) and simple modification to the LGA 775 socket to get it to work. I detailed my own experience converting a Dell pre-built in this post --> http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=36890787&postcount=39
 

cbn

Lifer
Mar 27, 2009
12,968
221
106
Opteron 165. (This chip was known to be the bang for the buck high end processor back in the socket 939 days).

1.8 Ghz base clock dual core with 2MB L2 cache. It could overclock to 2.7 Ghz and beyond.
 

happy medium

Lifer
Jun 8, 2003
14,387
480
126
My vote also goes to the Xeon E5440 (which is the 80 watt TDP equivalent of the Q9550).

Currently it is $18 shipped on ebay "buy it now auctions" and be overclocked just like the Q9550.

Side Note: It does need a LGA 771 to LGA 775 adapter sticker (~$2 to $3) and simple modification to the LGA 775 socket to get it to work. I detailed my own experience converting a Dell pre-built in this post --> http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=36890787&postcount=39

wow I agree !
 

MrTeal

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2003
3,918
2,708
136
Part of it is the lower clocks it has. It is almost like overclocking cheating. I would think something like a Intel Pentium G3258 would get on the list first.
I'd actually go the other way, because the value was better with the E2140. They were both ~$75 chips, but the E2140 competed against the $500 Q6600, the $300 E6600 or the $500 E6700 on the top end. The lack of cache hurt, but a 3GHz+ E2140 was very competitive with a stock 2.67GHz E6700.
It doesn't matter what you do to a G3258, it's not going to touch a stock <$350 i7-4790k.
 

cbn

Lifer
Mar 27, 2009
12,968
221
106
I'd actually go the other way, because the value was better with the E2140. They were both ~$75 chips, but the E2140 competed against the $500 Q6600, the $300 E6600 or the $500 E6700 on the top end. The lack of cache hurt, but a 3GHz+ E2140 was very competitive with a stock 2.67GHz E6700.
It doesn't matter what you do to a G3258, it's not going to touch a stock <$350 i7-4790k.

I think that is a good analogy. (though OC 2140 would not compete with Q6600 because of the difference in core count. Certainly a comparison to E6700 is valid though).
 
Last edited:

MrTeal

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2003
3,918
2,708
136
I think that is a good analogy. (though OC 2140 would not compete with Q6600 because of the difference in core count. Certainly a comparison to E6700 is valid though).

Yeah, I didn't mean to imply that the E2140 was competitive with the Q6600 though it could be in single threaded applications. Those were just the best chips available at the time other than the thousand dollar X6800.
 

Sunrise089

Senior member
Aug 30, 2005
882
0
71
Athlon 64 3000+, 50% overclocks and slightly earlier to market than the similarly clocking Opterons.
 

poofyhairguy

Lifer
Nov 20, 2005
14,612
318
126
I'd actually go the other way, because the value was better with the E2140. They were both ~$75 chips, but the E2140 competed against the $500 Q6600, the $300 E6600 or the $500 E6700 on the top end. The lack of cache hurt, but a 3GHz+ E2140 was very competitive with a stock 2.67GHz E6700.
It doesn't matter what you do to a G3258, it's not going to touch a stock <$350 i7-4790k.

Good point
 

aigomorla

CPU, Cases&Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
21,065
3,572
126
Celeron 300A
Opteron 165 / AMD X2 Manchester / Toledo cores....
3.jpg


E6600 Conroe
3-1.jpg


Q6600 Kentsfield
3.825GHZQ6600.jpg


Q9XXX Yorkfield
SP1M4417.jpg


i7 9XX Bloomfield (sorry dont have a 920... but i had a 975)
Capture5.jpg


i7 9XX Gulftown
benchies.jpg


Heh notice i was conservative with voltages on these cpu's as they were probably all cherry bin picked. :D

Then we lost overclocking and was forced to do it via multiplier.. (sad sad days)

My best cpu... i7 990X (still in use)
Capture_zps52f45dd8.jpg


My most memorable CPU..
That yorkfield... although it did die... and it gave me many many hours listening to gillbot rant a storm in trying to get it to post... :D
 
Last edited:

Arcanedeath

Platinum Member
Jan 29, 2000
2,822
1
76
I'd say the celeron 300/333A's, the pentium 3 550E (most made it to 733 fine), Athlon xp 2500+(& mobile versions too) @2.2ghz+, Athlon 64 4400+ /Opteron 170 @ 2.8ghz+, i7 920, xeon x5650, & the i5 2500k.

This would be my current list of cpu hall of fame chips.
 

lopri

Elite Member
Jul 27, 2002
13,313
687
126
Sorry about necro'ing the thread but I had to voice my opinion that Q6600 was a total dud when it comes to overclocking outside of a few golden nuggets. I even have a dead Q6600 in a drawer.

I would add E4300, E2140/E2160, and Opteron 144/145/146 to the list. I've gotten 100% OC out of E2140/E2160 and 50%+ out of Socket 939 Opterons.

Since then only 2500K and 1045T could do anything close to 50% overclock in my experience. (Of course lower base clocks help when the success is measured by percentage.)
 

StrangerGuy

Diamond Member
May 9, 2004
8,443
124
106
I'd actually go the other way, because the value was better with the E2140. They were both ~$75 chips, but the E2140 competed against the $500 Q6600, the $300 E6600 or the $500 E6700 on the top end. The lack of cache hurt, but a 3GHz+ E2140 was very competitive with a stock 2.67GHz E6700.
It doesn't matter what you do to a G3258, it's not going to touch a stock <$350 i7-4790k.

And quadcores in C2D days aren't as mandatory as what they are now today.

Value-oriented OCing today with Haswell is a complete joke compared to those glory years where a $183 E6300 can easily match and exceed a $1000 X6800.