overclocking an unlocked mobile 2500+ barton

azazal

Member
Aug 2, 2004
28
0
0
without extra fans, water cooling etc, just stock hs/fan, what is the highest ( stable) mhz
 

XMan

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
12,513
49
91
Mine runs at 2.2 GHz. at around 1.55 volts. I haven't tried any higher because it's pretty snappy as it is.
 

Delorian

Senior member
Mar 10, 2004
590
0
0
My 2.2Ghz 2500+ is read as a 3200+ in my post and windows info. Performance isn't quite as good as a 3200+ but very close.
 

XMan

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
12,513
49
91
Originally posted by: Delorian
My 2.2Ghz 2500+ is read as a 3200+ in my post and windows info. Performance isn't quite as good as a 3200+ but very close.

Unless you're not running at 200 MHz FSB, I don't buy that statement . . .

But azazal, yes, 2.2 GHz = 3200+ for Athlon XP's.
 

Kenazo

Lifer
Sep 15, 2000
10,429
1
81
I've had retail AXP 2500's at 3200+ (200x11) quite regularily. almost a given.

AXP 2500m @ 200x12 = 2400mhz. (about 3400+?)

Though there is no "stock" cooling for AXPM's. They all come bare.
 

John

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
33,944
3
81
I run my XP2500+M @ 2.5GHz (217FSB) 1.8v using a SLK800a &amp; Panaflo L1A 80mm fan. Full load temps are around 61C.

I believe this would be a 3700+ if you were to use a PR Rating.
 

Delorian

Senior member
Mar 10, 2004
590
0
0
Originally posted by: X-Man
Originally posted by: Delorian
My 2.2Ghz 2500+ is read as a 3200+ in my post and windows info. Performance isn't quite as good as a 3200+ but very close.

Unless you're not running at 200 MHz FSB, I don't buy that statement . . .

But azazal, yes, 2.2 GHz = 3200+ for Athlon XP's.

I am running 11x200 with a desktop barton 2500+ reaching 2200 Mhz. I thought the 3200+ had more cache but I'm wrong, in that case my 2500+ is the same as a 3200+ barton though Sisoft's Sandra benchmarks my cpu around the 3000+ level. Not sure why though.
 

XMan

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
12,513
49
91
Originally posted by: Delorian
Originally posted by: X-Man
Originally posted by: Delorian
My 2.2Ghz 2500+ is read as a 3200+ in my post and windows info. Performance isn't quite as good as a 3200+ but very close.

Unless you're not running at 200 MHz FSB, I don't buy that statement . . .

But azazal, yes, 2.2 GHz = 3200+ for Athlon XP's.

I am running 11x200 with a desktop barton 2500+ reaching 2200 Mhz. I thought the 3200+ had more cache but I'm wrong, in that case my 2500+ is the same as a 3200+ barton though Sisoft's Sandra benchmarks my cpu around the 3000+ level. Not sure why though.

Could be motherboard chipset.