Suicides are not uncommon at Niagara Falls....Gromosiak said he believes the man must have been attempting suicide, given the way he went over and the thin odds of survival.
the first person known to have done it without safety devices and lived.
Originally posted by: Lucky
konichiwa, i interpreted the "life jacket" to be a safety device and the claim by the article to hold true unless there is someone else.
Originally posted by: tweakmm
People are crazy to go over niagra falls with safety devices.
Have you guys seen them? Those suckers are BIG.
It's not just the fast moving river part. it's the ~160(depending on the fall) drop that has lots of sharp rocks on the bottom that get's people. I don't think being in a boat would be too effective if you were trying to make it out alive on the other end. The only way I would go over the falls is in a specialy designed barrel with safety harness and padding out the ass.Originally posted by: TheCorm
Originally posted by: tweakmm
People are crazy to go over niagra falls with safety devices.
Have you guys seen them? Those suckers are BIG.
Going down a fast moving river without any safety devices....or more preferably...a boat isn't too bright....but THIS!
Originally posted by: pulse8
As the article states, however, the 7 year old kid went over the Canadian side and this guy went over the American side. Apparently the American side is not as friendly.
Originally posted by: Bootprint
Originally posted by: pulse8
As the article states, however, the 7 year old kid went over the Canadian side and this guy went over the American side. Apparently the American side is not as friendly.
Where does it say he went over the American side?
I wonder what the rescue is going to cost him?
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: Bootprint
Originally posted by: pulse8
As the article states, however, the 7 year old kid went over the Canadian side and this guy went over the American side. Apparently the American side is not as friendly.
Where does it say he went over the American side?
I wonder what the rescue is going to cost him?
What rescue? He got out of the water by himself.
Originally posted by: Bootprint
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: Bootprint
Originally posted by: pulse8
As the article states, however, the 7 year old kid went over the Canadian side and this guy went over the American side. Apparently the American side is not as friendly.
Where does it say he went over the American side?
I wonder what the rescue is going to cost him?
What rescue? He got out of the water by himself.
Some one had to bring him up, you can't just walk up from the base of the falls.
Different picture
Originally posted by: pulse8
As the article states, however, the 7 year old kid went over the Canadian side and this guy went over the American side. Apparently the American side is not as friendly.
No one has ever survived a trip over the narrower and rockier American falls.
Originally posted by: Bootprint
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: Bootprint
Originally posted by: pulse8
As the article states, however, the 7 year old kid went over the Canadian side and this guy went over the American side. Apparently the American side is not as friendly.
Where does it say he went over the American side?
I wonder what the rescue is going to cost him?
What rescue? He got out of the water by himself.
Some one had to bring him up, you can't just walk up from the base of the falls.
Different picture
Anyway, fine for going over the falls = $10,000 (I'm not sure if that's US or CDN currency)