Over 20 US states still have adultery as an illegal act punishable by fine or jail

Oldgamer

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,280
1
0
AFTER 223 years New Hampshire is about to make adultery legal. A law in 1791 called for convicted adulterers to be paraded on the gallows for an hour and then “publicly whipped not exceeding 39 stripes” before being sent to prison and fined £100 (probably more than a year’s wages in those days).

The penalty has grown milder since then. Adulterers now face a $1,200 fine, which is not enforced. New Hampshire’s state House of Representatives voted to repeal the law in February; the state Senate is expected to follow soon. Not everyone is happy. A letter to the Concord Monitor huffed that adultery was “repugnant” and should remain a crime.

More than 20 states still have laws against adultery. Colorado (the state of Gary Hart, whose adultery cost him dear in the 1988 presidential race) did not decriminalise it until last year. Courts rarely hand down convictions; the most notable of recent times was in Massachusetts in 1983, when two policemen caught a married man and woman having sex in a van. They weren’t married to each other, and the woman, who challenged the charge, was fined $50.

Chart titled 'It's fine to be gay but not to stray'
Few Americans want the state to police their bedrooms, but 93% think adultery is morally wrong, a recent CNN poll found. That view has stiffened over the past few decades, even as attitudes to homosexuality have softened dramatically (see chart). This may be because, since the liberalising 1960s, Americans now know more about the real-world consequences of both. Many grow up at ease with gay friends but upset by their parents’ divorces.

20140419_USC744_0.png


How many Americans have strayed? In the General Social Survey, 15% of wives and 21% of husbands admitted to it. But a separate survey found that 74% of men and 68% of women said they would indulge in an affair if they knew they wouldn't get caught. The law may no longer punish cheaters, but their spouses will if they find out.

Link to article

It still blows my mind that these states have this as a law. That and those states who make dildos illegal too..lol
 

nehalem256

Lifer
Apr 13, 2012
15,669
8
0
It still blows my mind that these states have this as a law.l

So basically you are admitting that you think marriage has no purpose and is just a circle jerk to get government benefits.

Good to see an honest liberal at least :thumbsup:
 

finglobes

Senior member
Dec 13, 2010
739
0
0
One in five homosexuals has HIV - one in three black homosexuals has HIV. Sodomy should never be legal since its a huge public health hazard. Obama says football would too dangerous for his imaginary son - but he puts peoples real daughters in combat - then he pushes sodomy everywhere when it has a 20-33% chance of creating a fatal disease. This is what insanity looks like
 
Jan 25, 2011
16,943
9,346
146
One in five homosexuals has HIV - one in three black homosexuals has HIV. Sodomy should never be legal since its a huge public health hazard. Obama says football would too dangerous for his imaginary son - but he puts peoples real daughters in combat - then he pushes sodomy everywhere when it has a 20-33% chance of creating a fatal disease. This is what insanity looks like

Wow you really are just fucking delusional aren't ya?
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
So basically you are admitting that you think marriage has no purpose and is just a circle jerk to get government benefits.

Good to see an honest liberal at least :thumbsup:

If this was a joke it was a bad one, otherwise you're an idiot.

As to OP, they probably still exist because it would be more effort to repeal them as a standalone effort than to simply let them stand unenforced. Althought it'd be nice if they were to include their repeal as part of a larger future bill already being worked.
 

nehalem256

Lifer
Apr 13, 2012
15,669
8
0
If this was a joke it was a bad one, otherwise you're an idiot.

What joke. Liberals like to claim that marriage is about commitment, not procreation, when arguing for SSM.

Yet here we have them complaining when the government actually tries to enforce that commitment.

So essentially if marriage isn't about procreation, it isn't about commitment what then is it about?

Seems like its just a circle-jerk to get government benefits.
 

Oldgamer

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,280
1
0
I believe that government has no business in peoples personal sex lives, nor in their bedrooms. The fact that these laws still exist is disheartening. They could potentially fine you or put you in jail and this can lead to all sorts of other issues. I am not advocating cheating on your S.O. but when people do cheat it is usually a sign of a bigger problem in a relationship that can either be helped by counseling, or just by getting a divorce and moving on with ones life.
 

z1ggy

Lifer
May 17, 2008
10,010
66
91
One in five homosexuals has HIV - one in three black homosexuals has HIV. Sodomy should never be legal since its a huge public health hazard. Obama says football would too dangerous for his imaginary son - but he puts peoples real daughters in combat - then he pushes sodomy everywhere when it has a 20-33% chance of creating a fatal disease. This is what insanity looks like

Got my laugh for the day- thank you!
 
Jan 25, 2011
16,943
9,346
146
What joke. Liberals like to claim that marriage is about commitment, not procreation, when arguing for SSM.

Yet here we have them complaining when the government actually tries to enforce that commitment.

So essentially if marriage isn't about procreation, it isn't about commitment what then is it about?

Seems like its just a circle-jerk to get government benefits.

He made no such claim. Nor was it inferred. It's possible to believe it's about commitment without feeling someone should face criminal prosecution for not living up to it. But you knew that already. You just can't discuss things without a straw man.
 

nehalem256

Lifer
Apr 13, 2012
15,669
8
0
I believe that government has no business in peoples personal sex lives, nor in their bedrooms. The fact that these laws still exist is disheartening. They could potentially fine you or put you in jail and this can lead to all sorts of other issues. I am not advocating cheating on your S.O. but when people do cheat it is usually a sign of a bigger problem in a relationship that can either be helped by counseling, or just by getting a divorce and moving on with ones life.

Then perhaps you shouldn't demand that government get involved in your personal sex life? :confused:

Don't want to face charges of adultery then don't get married. Not hard.
 

nehalem256

Lifer
Apr 13, 2012
15,669
8
0
He made no such claim. Nor was it inferred. It's possible to believe it's about commitment without feeling someone should face criminal prosecution for not living up to it. But you knew that already. You just can't discuss things without a straw man.

Then it isn't much of a commitment is it?

If you break a legal commitment you face legal consequences. Makes perfect sense to me.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
Then perhaps you shouldn't demand that government get involved in your personal sex life? :confused:

Don't want to face charges of adultery then don't get married. Not hard.

While I don't think that government should be in the marriage business (i.e. selling marriage "licenses"), how you link that to adultery laws and stir in your anti-gay feelings is very weird. If you honestly think we're "honoring" marriage and making it stronger by having adultery laws on the books, I'll just assume you're well-intentioned but completely and naively incorrect.
 

nehalem256

Lifer
Apr 13, 2012
15,669
8
0
It is a civil contract with civil recource.

Marriage is a contract that results in the government granting considerable benefits.

As such the government is perfectly in the right to make certain requirements. If the idea of government involvement in marriage is based on the idea of "commitment" then the government should be able to enforce that commitment.

While I don't think that government should be in the marriage business (i.e. selling marriage "licenses"), how you link that to adultery laws and stir in your anti-gay feelings is very weird. If you honestly think we're "honoring" marriage and making it stronger by having adultery laws on the books, I'll just assume you're well-intentioned but completely and naively incorrect.

Adultery laws certainly aren't making it any weaker. Seems like the issue is more that the laws are unenforced.
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
What joke. Liberals like to claim that marriage is about commitment, not procreation, when arguing for SSM.

Yet here we have them complaining when the government actually tries to enforce that commitment.

So essentially if marriage isn't about procreation, it isn't about commitment what then is it about?

Seems like its just a circle-jerk to get government benefits.

And if you take 5 bananas and combine them with 3 shot glasses and then throw in some motor oil you end up with a beach towel. So there!
 

shira

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2005
9,500
6
81
So basically you are admitting that you think marriage has no purpose and is just a circle jerk to get government benefits.

Good to see an honest liberal at least :thumbsup:

No, moron, no one is "admitting" anything. Liberals recognize that people get married for whatever reasons they want, and it's not for us to judge what those reasons are. But whatever the reasons, the benefits and liabilities of marriage should be available to all consenting-adult couples, not just heterosexual couples.

As to the specific case of adultery laws, it's not the government's or anyone else's job to enforce morality codes - whether it be about masturbation, sodomy, "kinky" sexual practices, adultery, etc. - against private, consensual behavior. And that "stay out of my bedroom" concept should apply equally to straights and gays.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
So basically you are admitting that you think marriage has no purpose and is just a circle jerk to get government benefits.

Good to see an honest liberal at least :thumbsup:

Small government! :rolleyes:

The penalty for adultery should be determined by the parties involved, not by a judge.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
25,371
11,772
136
One in five homosexuals has HIV - one in three black homosexuals has HIV. Sodomy should never be legal since its a huge public health hazard. Obama says football would too dangerous for his imaginary son - but he puts peoples real daughters in combat - then he pushes sodomy everywhere when it has a 20-33% chance of creating a fatal disease. This is what insanity looks like

No, insanity looks lke this post. Rant On Bro.
 

nehalem256

Lifer
Apr 13, 2012
15,669
8
0
Small government! :rolleyes:

The penalty for adultery should be determined by the parties involved, not by a judge.

If you supported small government you would be opposed to government recognized marriage and hence adultery laws would not be an issue for you.

No, moron, no one is "admitting" anything. Liberals recognize that people get married for whatever reasons they want, and it's not for us to judge what those reasons are. But whatever the reasons, the benefits and liabilities of marriage should be available to all consenting-adult couples, not just heterosexual couples.

So basically you are admitting that you think marriage has no purpose and is just a circle jerk to get government benefits.

As to the specific case of adultery laws, it's not the government's or anyone else's job to enforce morality codes - whether it be about masturbation, sodomy, "kinky" sexual practices, adultery, etc. - against private, consensual behavior. And that "stay out of my bedroom" concept should apply equally to straights and gays.

If you dont want the government in your bedroom then don't invite them in. Geez, doesn't seem like a difficult concept.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
If you supported small government you would be opposed to government recognized marriage and hence adultery laws would not be an issue for you.


If you dont want the government in your bedroom then don't invite them in. Geez, doesn't seem like a difficult concept.

How exactly would we get rid of government recognized marriage with adultery laws still on the books?
Go screw your toaster.