Originally posted by: RichardE
http://www.lspace.org/ftp/imag...c/terrys-signature.jpg
Now, That is a very elaborate signature in that Terry (who I assume it belongs too) will never be able to repeat it *exactly* that way.
Now if someone comes with a document that has Terrys signature and his "written" (not printed, or stamped) signature is exactly the same it can be safe to assume that someone copied his signature onto another paper and used that to make this signature. Since you will never be able to recreate your signature exactly alike (try it if you want, not slowly, but write it like you usually do, if you "try" to copy it you are repeating the patterns of forgers.).
Now, for comparisons sakes with other signatures, we look at the loops, or how often his flow is broken, the way specific loops are or dashes that are common among many of Terrys signatures. Analyzing it "perfectly" requires many copies of someones signature. So if I have say 10 or 12 copies of something you signed, I could find which traits you use in your signature and repeat them well enough to forge your signature.
*edit* A note or though. You are right in that signatures are outdated as means of an expressions of consent. Anything having to due with forgery and detecting it will always happen after the fact. (After your bank accounts empty, after the sell order, after the shipping order ect). On the same path of though the *science* behind forging someones signature will always be the cause for the harm done (Looking at a dozen examples of your signature and learning how to forge it properly enough that it will evade detection as a forgery until I am long gone).