- Aug 4, 2000
- 28,927
- 1,935
- 126
This was an offshoot of another thread, which should be separate:
I mentioned that the cost of care is very high under the current regime. I have to pay $3,000 out of pocket before my insurance company pays anything, including doctor visits and medicine. This is thanks to Obamacare, which lifted the maximum a policy will pay during its lifetime. If you have a chronic condition or have a bad accident or problem that requires a lifetime of care, the maximum benefits you could claim in the past was $1,000,000 cumulative over how many years you have the policy. Now that cap is removed. Theoretically you could run up a bill over $1M - in just one year - and you only pay according to your plan, unusually 10% or $100,000 plus any deductibles.
Some have suggested a national healthcare scheme is the solution where costs are paid with higher income taxes ("healthcare tax") on top of marginal rates. However there are problems with this type of care as well including lower quality care, long wait times for appointments and assigned doctors within a zip code. If all your doctors are bad, too bad.
Here is someone describing a problems with the healthcare scheme in the UK:
Long wait times, short consultations, silly rules, etc
(Its only a brief part of a larger problem of poverty in the UK that I happened to be watching).
What do you think?
I mentioned that the cost of care is very high under the current regime. I have to pay $3,000 out of pocket before my insurance company pays anything, including doctor visits and medicine. This is thanks to Obamacare, which lifted the maximum a policy will pay during its lifetime. If you have a chronic condition or have a bad accident or problem that requires a lifetime of care, the maximum benefits you could claim in the past was $1,000,000 cumulative over how many years you have the policy. Now that cap is removed. Theoretically you could run up a bill over $1M - in just one year - and you only pay according to your plan, unusually 10% or $100,000 plus any deductibles.
Some have suggested a national healthcare scheme is the solution where costs are paid with higher income taxes ("healthcare tax") on top of marginal rates. However there are problems with this type of care as well including lower quality care, long wait times for appointments and assigned doctors within a zip code. If all your doctors are bad, too bad.
Here is someone describing a problems with the healthcare scheme in the UK:
Long wait times, short consultations, silly rules, etc
(Its only a brief part of a larger problem of poverty in the UK that I happened to be watching).
What do you think?