Other than Bragging rights, is there a reason for MP dual chip mobo's at home??

krazykilroy

Member
Aug 14, 2001
149
0
0
I mean what reasons wuold you need a tiger MP with dual 1.9 Athlon MP chips at home for???

I only need one excuse, and it's a done deal. I'm a jack of all trades, master of none.

I play UO, Counter-strike, and am about to get motor city online. I use my scanner a lot, use office, among other things.

I wanted to go to win XP to maximize Ram capacity, and start a counter-strike server, but am not sure.

So why would anyone use a dual chip multi-platform mobo for home use????
 

FlippyBoy

Senior member
Jun 17, 2001
886
0
76
well, for one thing, dualie systems tend to be much snappier and responsive. i notice that web pages load smoother, and apps just respond quicker. beyond that, unless you use many multi-threaded apps, or have many, many things running at once, you wont see too much difference.
 

PliotronX

Diamond Member
Oct 17, 1999
8,883
107
106
For running single programs at a time, it isn't worth the extra cost IMO (unless the program is heavily SMP optimized). For heavy multitasking, however, it will be leaps and bounds better. You can say encode a DivX while doing other stuff like burning a CD or surfing. Whether this kind of ability is worth it, is up to you.
 

Odoacer

Senior member
Jun 30, 2001
809
0
0
The only time when I see a noticeable increase in Photoshop performance is when im working with big documents (more than 10 inches big). And this is with a K6-2 500.

3D rendering and multimedia encoding is where the money's at. And most games (q3a and RTCW are the most notable exceptions) dont have SMP support.
 

Poontos

Platinum Member
Mar 9, 2000
2,799
0
0
No.

In some cases the MP setup is quite a bit slower than a single CPU system, even in a MP compatible OS.
 

thomsbrain

Lifer
Dec 4, 2001
18,148
1
0
Fair Use, which IMO is the best DivX program, is multi-treaded, and so is Photoshop. Between those two programs, that's most of my CPU cycles, right there. So a dualie would be great for me. But it sounds like from what you do, it would not benefit you at all. In fact, you don't even need one XP 1900+. You'd be fine on a 1 GHz machine.