Originally posted by: Joeyman
Here you go
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: Joeyman
Here you go
Better shut the forums down... nothing has ever been discussed that couldn't be found through google.
Wow.. awesome link! The broken images really add to the credibility of the web site.Originally posted by: Joeyman
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: Joeyman
Here you go
Better shut the forums down... nothing has ever been discussed that couldn't be found through google.
Look it sounded like somone wanted us to do their report for them.
Here's the info btw, took 30 secs on google
"Syrian Hamsters were first domesticated in 1930, although the Syrian was presented as a new species in 1839. They are native to the deserts of Syria."
Originally posted by: allisolm
Did you think that the first one was discovered in a pet store?![]()
Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
Wow.. awesome link! The broken images really add to the credibility of the web site.Originally posted by: Joeyman
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: Joeyman
Here you go
Better shut the forums down... nothing has ever been discussed that couldn't be found through google.
Look it sounded like somone wanted us to do their report for them.
Here's the info btw, took 30 secs on google
"Syrian Hamsters were first domesticated in 1930, although the Syrian was presented as a new species in 1839. They are native to the deserts of Syria."![]()
Originally posted by: allisolm
I know they originated somewhere in Syria.
Gee, then why did you ask where they originated from?
Just can't find the date and if they were wild or not..
Did I miss the part where you asked if they were originally wild? Did you think that the first one was discovered in a pet store?
Here is a history including how they live in the wild. Took 30 sec also.
My point was that your argument was weak because you managed to pull up a really crappy hamster web site with google. You could have done a better job of proving your point by pulling up a web site that was actually worth visiting. But you blew it.Originally posted by: Joeyman
Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
Wow.. awesome link! The broken images really add to the credibility of the web site.Originally posted by: Joeyman
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: Joeyman
Here you go
Better shut the forums down... nothing has ever been discussed that couldn't be found through google.
Look it sounded like somone wanted us to do their report for them.
Here's the info btw, took 30 secs on google
"Syrian Hamsters were first domesticated in 1930, although the Syrian was presented as a new species in 1839. They are native to the deserts of Syria."![]()
as I said that took 30 secs to find as is the first link using the words "hamsters first domesticated" in google. Try it you'll find lots of info. oh yeah andback at yah!![]()
Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
My point was that your argument was weak because you managed to pull up a really crappy hamster web site with google. You could have done a better job of proving your point by pulling up a web site that was actually worth visiting. But you blew it.Originally posted by: Joeyman
Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
Wow.. awesome link! The broken images really add to the credibility of the web site.Originally posted by: Joeyman
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: Joeyman
Here you go
Better shut the forums down... nothing has ever been discussed that couldn't be found through google.
Look it sounded like somone wanted us to do their report for them.
Here's the info btw, took 30 secs on google
"Syrian Hamsters were first domesticated in 1930, although the Syrian was presented as a new species in 1839. They are native to the deserts of Syria."![]()
as I said that took 30 secs to find as is the first link using the words "hamsters first domesticated" in google. Try it you'll find lots of info. oh yeah andback at yah!![]()
Instead of trying to tell me how I'm wrong, you use the old "I'm going to leave this argument because I'm better than you," statement. It's a classic... I've seen it countless times. btw.. I never lose because I'm a Winner, unlike you.Originally posted by: Joeyman
Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
My point was that your argument was weak because you managed to pull up a really crappy hamster web site with google. You could have done a better job of proving your point by pulling up a web site that was actually worth visiting. But you blew it.Originally posted by: Joeyman
Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
Wow.. awesome link! The broken images really add to the credibility of the web site.Originally posted by: Joeyman
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: Joeyman
Here you go
Better shut the forums down... nothing has ever been discussed that couldn't be found through google.
Look it sounded like somone wanted us to do their report for them.
Here's the info btw, took 30 secs on google
"Syrian Hamsters were first domesticated in 1930, although the Syrian was presented as a new species in 1839. They are native to the deserts of Syria."![]()
as I said that took 30 secs to find as is the first link using the words "hamsters first domesticated" in google. Try it you'll find lots of info. oh yeah andback at yah!![]()
Like I care. You know, I'm not going to try to argue with you PowerMac4Ever because you never want to lose. I'm done talking about hamsters.
Originally posted by: guyver01
Originally posted by: allisolm
Did you think that the first one was discovered in a pet store?![]()
you owe me a new monitor!!
![]()