Oregon vs Oklahoma

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

chuckywang

Lifer
Jan 12, 2004
20,133
1
0
Originally posted by: yosuke188
Didn't the referee say that the receiving team (Oklahoma) player touched before 10 yards? Actually, I'm almost certain that he did.

Maybe there is a crazy rule about the player on the receiving team touching the ball before the 10 yards that would somehow make everything legal. Or maybe the referee got it all mixed up. I don't know.

It is a rule that the kicking team cannot be the first team to touch the ball within 10 yards.


The two rules for a ball being live as I've been informed are:

(1) If the receiving team touches the ball, it's live no matter where it is.
(2) If the ball traveled 10 yards, it's live.


The ref said (1) occured, but I believe (2) occured.
 

kinev

Golden Member
Mar 28, 2005
1,647
30
91
Originally posted by: Drakkon
wow...whatta game....go pac 10!!!

as for "the call"...yes oregon touched the ball but it made for an exciting end to a great game...i wish more refs would make calls that gave teams chances that played a great game. It would've sucked ass if the game ended on that note. Thats the stuff movies are made of :p

Wow. That's almost as asinine as the calls.
 

DayLaPaul

Platinum Member
Apr 6, 2001
2,072
0
76

ahahahaha...i love how someone on that board posted blurry, inconclusive freeze frames of the onsides kick saying it was touched early and everyone else just agrees like it's fact. I'm not saying that it wasn't. I'm just saying that with the camera angles and parallax, it's impossible to overturn that call. While the guy's body hasn't cleared 10 yards, you can see he is reaching forward in mid air. Also, don't forget that only the tip of the ball has to break 10 yards for it to be legal.
 

MidasKnight

Diamond Member
Apr 24, 2004
3,288
0
76
Long time Duck Fan here ... from what I saw on the ABC replays ... Oregon touched the ball at about 9 yards ... that makes it illegal. Should have been reversed by the replay official. Sooners should have got the ball back and they would have run the time out to win the game.

Very bad replay official ruling IMO !
 

b0mbrman

Lifer
Jun 1, 2001
29,470
1
81

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,402
8,574
126
hahhahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahha

<breathe>

ahahhaahahhaaahaahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahHhHhHhHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHhahahahhahahahahahahahhaahh
 

ctark

Senior member
Sep 6, 2004
726
1
0
You know what the funny part is, ABC didnt show the whole replay.. its appeared oregon recovered the onside kick... but it went between the guys legs and the OU player got it The officials were marking the ball at the pile and the ball wasnt even in that pile.. the OU player had the ball and was walking off the field as if they won the game, Also Oregon should've got called offsides when the kicker walked pass the ball.. thats an automatic call.. no matter what. They missed 3 calls in 1 game which shouldnt be acceptable with instant replay. The refs even made a few bad calls early in the game that went against oregon.. but nothing game changing. The guy who was reviewing the replay should be fired.
 

BlancoNino

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2005
5,695
0
0
Originally posted by: ctark
You know what the funny part is, ABC didnt show the whole replay.. its appeared oregon recovered the onside kick... but it went between the guys legs and the OU player got it The officials were marking the ball at the pile and the ball wasnt even in that pile.. the OU player had the ball and was walking off the field as if they won the game, Also Oregon should've got called offsides when the kicker walked pass the ball.. thats an automatic call.. no matter what. They missed 3 calls in 1 game which shouldnt be acceptable with instant replay. The refs even made a few bad calls early in the game that went against oregon.. but nothing game changing. The guy who was reviewing the replay should be fired.

I'd call letting Oklahoma snap the ball when the playclock was at 0 and then unload a huge pass play on 3rd down that set up a touchdown pretty gamechanging.

Who knows what would have happened. Illegal procedure on Oregon, rekick the ball...maybe Oregon recovers...who knows. The angles are inconclusive. There was not 1 angle that showed a perfect shot from the side and it looked close (9 or 10 yards).
 
Nov 5, 2001
18,366
3
0
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
I thought it was short of the 10 yard mark as well. But then after the replays I noticed the angles weren't very good (they were all from the side) and it looks like he touched it right at the 10-yard mark. Regardless, I call that a make up call for letting Oklahoma snap the ball after the clock hit 0 twice.

You need to realize that the clock shown on TV is NOT the official game clock. There is often a small difference between the two.
 

thereds

Diamond Member
Apr 4, 2000
7,886
0
0
Read this...especially the stuff in bold.

Fvck the NCAA.

Humility key for lucky Ducks

Sunday, September 17, 2006

EUGENE There is no conclusive video evidence to support this theory, but we should probably consider the possibility that some Oklahoma player opened an umbrella indoors Saturday. Or spilled salt on the team training table. Or broke the mirror in the visiting locker room before kickoff.

Unlucky bunch, those Sooners.

Say it at your own risk today, though.

Because during Oregon's 34-33 victory at Autzen Stadium, the Ducks adapted, overcame and did just about everything necessary to start the season 3-0. The rest was provided by human error.

If we're going to have a group catharsis here, we need to acknowledge that Mr. Magoo must have been working the video replay booth. If they're going to use instant replay and slow down the games and leave players and coaches and fans standing around, they'd better start getting it right.

The onside kick in the final 72 seconds that was awarded to the Ducks? If you were watching on television from your sofa, you saw it touch Oregon's Brian Paysinger before it traveled 10 yards. Your spouse saw it. Your children saw it. The family dog probably saw it. So did anyone in the stadium who looked up at the giant video monitor.

Yet, inside the stadium, which happens to be the only place it counts, it was, "After further review, there is conclusive evidence the receiving team touched the ball . . ." and then, a whole lot of pandemonium.

Same goes for two plays later, with the replay showing a throw by Dennis Dixon that resulted in a pass interference penalty against Oklahoma being tipped at the line of scrimmage. While the officials were reviewing that play, looking for the tip that would nullify the penalty, Dixon wandered to the Oregon sideline, where his coach asked, "Was it tipped, Dennis?"

The answer: "Yes, sir."

Then, it went: "After further review, there was no conclusive evidence . . ." and two plays later, the Ducks seized the lead on a 23-yard touchdown pass to Paysinger. Suddenly, hundreds of ticket holders who had left the stadium with Oregon trailing by two scores were scurrying back through the turnstiles, pleading with security guards to let them re-enter the stadium.
 

BlancoNino

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2005
5,695
0
0
Originally posted by: MikeyIs4Dcats
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
I thought it was short of the 10 yard mark as well. But then after the replays I noticed the angles weren't very good (they were all from the side) and it looks like he touched it right at the 10-yard mark. Regardless, I call that a make up call for letting Oklahoma snap the ball after the clock hit 0 twice.

You need to realize that the clock shown on TV is NOT the official game clock. There is often a small difference between the two.

The announcers mentioned it too and they have view of the official game clock. Also, what about the offensive pushoff by Oklahoma that resulted in a receiving touchdown? The whole game was badly officiated...both teams got screwd at some point, but everyone is going to talk about the end game stuff because it's more memorable. Oregon could have been up by 3 touchdowns if it were called right, so nobody knows.