- Nov 23, 2001
- 6,712
- 142
- 106
i decided to test all the different ways to runs seti on my linux system (P4m 1.8 256mb ddr laptop)
so i picked up the ars benchmark packet
droped to only the console killed all uneeded daemons and programs
well here are my results:
1) setiathome-3.03.i386-pc-linux cpu=18270.190000 nice priority: -19
2) setiathome-3.03.i686-pc-linux cpu=18122.920000 nice priority: -19
3) setiathome-3.03.i386-winnt-cmdline cpu=15471.100000 nice priority: wine -19 wineserver +5
4) setiathome-3.03.i386-winnt-cmdline cpu=14696.720000 nice priority: wine -19 wineserver -18
5) setiathome-3.03.i386-winnt-cmdline cpu=14679.260000 nice priority: wine -19 wineserver -5
6) setiathome-3.03.i386-winnt-cmdline cpu=14646.560000 nice priority: wine -19 wineserver 0
Welp the windows version running through wine is the fastest (havn't tryed running it under windows cause i don't have windows installed)
I woulda expected #4 to run faster maybe it was a fluke. I'll run it again to test it out
it would be interesting to see what kinda difference in times you would get between 1 and 2 on an athlon system maybe i'll try that later when i get my athlon system up and going
so i picked up the ars benchmark packet
droped to only the console killed all uneeded daemons and programs
well here are my results:
1) setiathome-3.03.i386-pc-linux cpu=18270.190000 nice priority: -19
2) setiathome-3.03.i686-pc-linux cpu=18122.920000 nice priority: -19
3) setiathome-3.03.i386-winnt-cmdline cpu=15471.100000 nice priority: wine -19 wineserver +5
4) setiathome-3.03.i386-winnt-cmdline cpu=14696.720000 nice priority: wine -19 wineserver -18
5) setiathome-3.03.i386-winnt-cmdline cpu=14679.260000 nice priority: wine -19 wineserver -5
6) setiathome-3.03.i386-winnt-cmdline cpu=14646.560000 nice priority: wine -19 wineserver 0
Welp the windows version running through wine is the fastest (havn't tryed running it under windows cause i don't have windows installed)
I woulda expected #4 to run faster maybe it was a fluke. I'll run it again to test it out
it would be interesting to see what kinda difference in times you would get between 1 and 2 on an athlon system maybe i'll try that later when i get my athlon system up and going